ArticleRegenerative therapy2021
Cultured epithelial autografts for the treatment of large-to-giant congenital melanocytic nevus in 31 patients.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence of neurocutaneous melanosis in Japanese pediatric patients with congenital melanocytic nevi.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGiant congenital melanocytic nevus (GCMN) is a large melanocytic nevus, and its full-thickness removal is usually difficult due to the lack of skin available for reconstruction. Curettage is an alternative approach in cases of GCMN to remove the superficial dermis above the cleavage plane with a curette in the neonatal period, and its major complications include repigmentation, retarded epithelization, and hypertrophic scar formation. In Japan, the JACE® cultured epidermal autograft (CEA) was approved and covered by public healthcare insurance for the treatment of congenital melanocytic nevus (CMN) that is difficult to treat with conventional methods in 2016. We have used CEA for wounds after curettage in the neonatal period or following ablation after the neonatal period in combination with laser therapies to reduce the above-mentioned complications.
methodsIn this study, we summarized all consecutive CMN patients treated using CEA from December 2016 to April 2019 and evaluated the duration required for epithelialization, incidence of hypertrophic scar, and color change in the target nevus by comparing the L∗ values one year later between the Curettage group, the non-Curettage group with initial treatment or the subsequent group.
resultsNo significant differences were seen in the epithelization period or incidence of hypertrophic scars among the groups, but the color of the target nevus was improved significantly in the Curettage group (p < 0.01) and non-Curettage group with initial treatment (p < 0.01).
conclusionsIn conclusion, CEA seems to accelerate epithelization after curettage or ablation of CMN, and this treatment could improve the color of CMN when applied initially.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.