ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2021
Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Internal Brace Augmentation: Results in 40 Consecutive Patients.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preliminary clinical outcomes of shoelace repair with internal brace for ulnar collateral ligament injuries with chronic avulsion bone fragments in student baseball players.JSES international · 2026Article
- Elbow ulnar collateral ligament repair: a systematic review of trends and outcomes.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Review
- A systematic review of surgical outcomes of ulnar collateral ligament rupture in the elbow treated with various techniques.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Clinical and biomechanical outcomes following patellar tendon repair with suture tape augmentation.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023Article
- The role of arthroscopy in instability of the elbow.JSES international · 2023Review
- Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament (UCL) Repair Using Suture Augmentation, Anchors, and Bone Tunnels.Arthroscopy techniques · 2023Article
- Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture Augmentation Results in Good Clinical Results, a Return-to-Play Rate Between 67% and 93%, and a Postoperative Complication Rate Up to 11.9%: A Systematic Review.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2023Review
- Factors Important to Patient Decision-Making After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury in Competitive High School and Collegiate Baseball Players.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Preclinical Studies.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Review
- Systematic Assessment of the Quality and Comprehensibility of YouTube Content on Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury and Management.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Intersurgeon Consistency of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Internal Brace: A Biomechanical Analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- Repair of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow With Internal Brace Augmentation.Video journal of sports medicineArticle
- Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation.Video journal of sports medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) repair has been proven to be effective in nonprofessional overhead-throwing athletes, with faster and higher rates of return to play (RTP) than the more traditional Tommy John reconstruction. Biomechanical studies and clinical data suggest that MUCL repair augmented with a collagen-coated internal brace may be an effective treatment option in this patient population. PURPOSE: To evaluate the functional outcomes of young nonprofessional athletes who underwent MUCL repair with internal brace augmentation for medial elbow instability. The hypothesis was that these patients will have high rates of RTP and improved functional outcomes. STUDY
designCase series; Level of evidence, 4.
methodsNonprofessional overhead athletes treated with MUCL repair with internal brace augmentation between 2015 and 2017 were prospectively evaluated for a minimum of 1 year. Preoperatively, all patients had evidence of medial elbow pain caused by MUCL insufficiency, as confirmed by signal changes on magnetic resonance imaging and valgus instability on arthroscopic examination. These findings did not allow them to participate in their chosen sport or profession, and each patient had failed nonoperative treatment. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated using the Overhead Athlete Shoulder and Elbow Score of the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic. Complications were recorded and detailed.
resultsA total of 40 nonprofessional overhead athletes were included in this study (35 men and 5 women; mean age, 17.8 years [range, 14-28 years]). The mean follow-up time was 23.8 months (range, 12-44 months). The mean postoperative Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic score was 92.6 (range, 64-100). Overall, 37 athletes (92.5%) returned to play or profession at the same level or higher at a mean time of 6.9 months (range, 2-12 months). Three patients did not RTP: 1 was limited by a concomitant medical diagnosis, and the other 2 chose not to resume athletics after the procedure but remained symptom free.
conclusionIn the nonprofessional athlete, primary MUCL repair with internal brace augmentation is a viable alternative to traditional repair techniques or reconstruction, allowing for a rapid RTP and promising functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.