Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34377709›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2021

Defining Return to Sport: A Systematic Review.

Joshua Doege, Jack M Ayres, Matthew J Mackay, Armin Tarakemeh, Symone M Brown, Bryan G Vopat, Mary K Mulcahey

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05332938 (Impact of Acetabular Fractures on Sports Performance), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05332938 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Acetabular Fractures on Sports Performance

TypeobservationalSponsorFondation Hôpital Saint-JosephRan2022 to 2023Enrolled283ConditionsAcetabular Fracture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Free tendon grafts for surgical management of chronic tears of the main body of the Achilles tendon: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Return to performance criteria in soccer after musculoskeletal injury: A scoping review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joshua DoegeTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Jack M AyresUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Matthew J MackayUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Armin TarakemehUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Symone M BrownTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Bryan G VopatUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Mary K MulcaheyTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReturn to sport (RTS) commonly serves as a measure for assessment of clinical outcomes in orthopaedic sports medicine surgery. Unfortunately, while RTS is commonly utilized in research for this purpose, currently there is no widely accepted or standardized definition for when an athlete has officially returned to his or her sport. PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review to evaluate and report the differences in specific definitions of RTS utilized in the orthopaedic surgery literature. STUDY

designSystematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

methodsA systematic review was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Trials databases per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Search terms consisted of variations of "RTS" combined with variations of "orthopedic surgery" and "define" to capture as many relevant articles as possible. The definition of RTS was recorded and analyzed.

resultsA total of 718 articles were identified in the initial search, 29 of which met eligibility criteria, providing a clear definition of RTS. Of the 29 studies included, 20 (69.0%) defined RTS as an athlete competing in a game or other competitive play. Three (10.3%) defined this as the athlete competing in a game or other competitive play but with an explicitly stated competition-level modifier of the athlete returning to his or her preinjury level of competition. Two articles (6.9%) included returning to training or practice, and the remaining 4 articles (13.8%) used terminology other than the standard RTS.

conclusionThere is variability in the definition of RTS used in orthopaedic sports medicine literature. Most studies refer to the athlete competing in a game or other competitive play. Other variants include returning to practice/training and explicitly defined competition levels and objectives. Future studies should aim to standardize the definition of RTS to facilitate more precise assessment of outcome after sports medicine surgery. Using terminology that describes components of the recovery and rehabilitation process, such as "return to participation" and "return to performance," in addition to RTS will allow us to more clearly understand the athlete's recovery and associated level of competition or performance.

Indexed as

athletic trainingmedical aspect of sportsphysical therapy/rehabilitationreturn to playreturn to sport

Identifiers

PMID34377709
PMCPMC8320574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.