Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34377598›Full record

ArticleGlobal advances in health and medicine2021

A Comprehensive Resiliency Framework: Theoretical Model, Treatment, and Evaluation.

Elyse R Park, Christina M Luberto, Emma Chad-Friedman, Lara Traeger, Daniel L Hall, Giselle K Perez, Brett Goshe, Ana-Maria Vranceanu, Margaret Baim, John W Denninger Md PhD and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global advances in health and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05438134 (Enhancing Resilience in Senior Living Community Residents), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05438134 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Enhancing Resilience in Senior Living Community Residents: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled288ConditionsQuality of Life, Stress, PsychologicalArmsSMART-3RP Group Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Do cancer curvivors and metavivors have distinct needs for stress management intervention? Retrospective analysis of a mind-body survivorship program.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  14. Life-Satisfaction, Engagement, Mindfulness, Flourishing, and Social Support: Do they Predict Depression, Suicide Ideation, and History of Suicide Attempt in Late Life?The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Testing psychosocial mediators of a mind-body resiliency intervention for cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elyse R ParkBenson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6319-264X
Christina M LubertoBenson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8866-6362
Emma Chad-FriedmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Lara TraegerBenson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel L HallBenson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Giselle K PerezBenson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brett GosheBenson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ana-Maria VranceanuBenson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Margaret BaimBenson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
John W Denninger Md PhDBenson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Gregory Fricchione MdBenson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Herbert Benson MdBenson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Suzanne C LechnerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

Funding

Research Training in Complementary and Integrative MedicineT32AT000051 · NCCIH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI GLORIA Y YEH · 1999 to 2026
$10.2M
Examining Delivery of Integrated Tobacco Treatment in Cancer CareK24CA197382 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PARK, ELYSE R. · 2015 to 2019
$841k
A Multimodal Mind-Body Intervention for Fear of Recurrence among Cancer SurvivorsK23AT010157 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HALL, DANIEL LEE · 2019 to 2023
$785k
NCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT010157NCCIH NIH HHS T32 AT000051NCI NIH HHS K24 CA197382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is heterogeneity in conceptualizations of resiliency, and there is, to date, no established theoretically driven resiliency assessment measure that aligns with a targeted resiliency intervention. We operationalize resiliency as one's ability to maintain adaptive functioning in response to the ongoing, chronic stress of daily living, and we use a novel resiliency measure that assesses the target components of an evidence based resiliency intervention. We present our resiliency theory, treatment model, and corresponding assessment measure (Current Experience Scale; CES).

methodsTo establish the psychometric properties of the CES, we report the factor structure and internal consistency reliability (N = 273). Among participants in our resiliency intervention (N = 151), we explored construct validity in terms of associations with theoretical model constructs, a validated resiliency measure, and sensitivity to change from before to after the intervention.

resultsResults indicated that a 23-item, 6-factor solution was a good fit to the data (RMSEA = .08, CFI = .97; TLI =.96) and internal consistency was good (α = .81 to .95). The CES showed correlations in the expected direction with resiliency model constructs (all

conclusionOur resiliency theory, treatment model, and outcome appear aligned; the CES demonstrated promise as a psychometrically sound outcome measure for our resiliency intervention and may be used in future longitudinal studies and resiliency building interventions to assess individuals' resiliency to adapt to ongoing stress.

Indexed as

healthmeasurementresiliencystresstheory

Identifiers

PMID34377598
PMCPMC8327002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.