Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34377591›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology2021

Pre-treatment tumor-infiltrating T cells influence response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

R S A Goedegebuure, M Harrasser, L K de Klerk, T S van Schooten, N C T van Grieken, M Eken, M S Grifhorst, N Pocorni, E S Jordanova, M I van Berge Henegouwen and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

R S A GoedegebuureAmsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M HarrasserAmsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
L K de KlerkAmsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
T S van SchootenAmsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
N C T van GriekenAmsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M EkenAmsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M S GrifhorstAmsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
N PocorniAmsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
E S JordanovaAmsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M I van Berge HenegouwenAmsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R E PouwAmsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H M W VerheulRadboud UMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J J van der VlietAmsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H W M van LaarhovenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3546-9709
V L J L ThijssenAmsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A J BassDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Boston, MA, USA.
T D De GruijlAmsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S DerksAmsterdam UMC, Location VUMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLOncode Institute · NLBroad Institute · USDutch Cancer Society · NLGynecologic Oncology Group · USLava Therapeutics (Netherlands) · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a disease with dismal treatment outcomes. Response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) varies greatly. Although the underlying mechanisms of CRT resistance are not identified, accumulating evidence indicates an important role for local antitumor immunity. To explore the immune microenvironment in relation to response to CRT we performed an in-depth analysis using multiplex immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry and mRNA expression analysis (NanoString) to generate a detailed map of the immunological landscape of pretreatment biopsies as well as peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of EAC patients. Response to CRT was assessed by Mandard's tumor regression grade (TRG), disease-free- and overall survival. Tumors with a complete pathological response (TRG 1) to neoadjuvant CRT had significantly higher tumor-infiltrating T cell levels compared to all other response groups (TRG 2-5). These T cells were also in closer proximity to tumor cells in complete responders compared to other response groups. Notably, immune profiles of near-complete responders (TRG 2) showed more resemblance to non-responders (TRG 3-5) than to complete responders. A high CD8:CD163 ratio in the tumor was associated with an improved disease-free survival. Gene expression analyses revealed that T cells in non-responders were Th2-skewed, while complete responders were enriched in cytotoxic immune cells. Finally, complete responders were enriched in circulating memory T cells. preexisting immune activation enhances the chance for a complete pathological response to neoadjuvant CRT. This information can potentially be used for future patient selection, but also fuels the development of immunomodulatory strategies to enhance CRT efficacy.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaRectal NeoplasmsHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearNeoadjuvant TherapyT-LymphocytesTumor Microenvironmentchemoradiationesophageal cancerimmune responseliquid biopsyTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID34377591
PMCPMC8344794
OpenAlexW3190112044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.