Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34377589›Full record

ArticleJournal of European CME2021

Report on Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual European CME Forum, Held Virtually, November, 2020.

Ron Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of European CME, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ron MurrayIndependent CME/CPD Consultant, Pickering, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In common with many scheduled meetings in 2020, the Thirteenth Annual European CME Forum (#13ECF) was conducted between 4 and 6 November 2020 in a virtual format. Faculty and attendees from around the world interacted via plenary sessions, breakout workshops, panel discussions, question and answer sessions, and oral presentations from selected poster authors. The plenaries dealt with topical themes such as outcomes, collaboration, changes in educational activities due to digitisation, accreditation standards, and essential competencies for continuing professional development (CPD) providers. Breakout workshop themes included online and informal learning, a global approach to outcomes, interprofessional collaboration, the role of industry, patients as teachers, simulation, pathways to accreditation and adaptation to the virtual landscape. The Forum provided a comprehensive model of educational practice in the rapidly changing environment brought on by a pandemic.

Indexed as

accreditationcollaborationdigitisationOutcomesvirtual

Identifiers

PMID34377589
PMCPMC8330717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.