ReviewHealth psychology open
What are weight bias measures measuring? An evaluation of core measures of weight bias and weight bias internalisation.
Review in Health psychology open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A mental model of obesity: comparing expert and public perceptions in Ireland, the UK, and the US.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Article
- Weight bias, stigma and discrimination: a call for greater conceptual clarity.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Clinical observations of weight stigma among nursing students: A descriptive approach.Obesity science & practice · 2024Article
- Reframing How Providers Advocate for Adolescent Well-Being in Body Image, Eating, and Weight.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2023Article
- Developing and validating a Japanese version of the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2023Article
- The role of social exposure in predicting weight bias and weight bias internalisation: an international study.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research exploring weight bias and weight bias internalisation (WBI) is grounded upon several core measures. This study aimed to evaluate whether operationalisations of these measures matched their conceptualisations in the literature. Using a 'closed card-sorting' methodology, participants sorted items from the most used measures into pre-defined categories, reflecting weight bias and non-weight bias. Findings indicated a high degree of congruence between WBI conceptualisations and operationalisations, however found less congruence between weight bias conceptualisations and operationalisations, with scale-items largely sorted into non-weight bias domains. Recommendations for scale modifications and developments are presented alongside a new amalgamated weight bias scale (AWBS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.