Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34377362›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2021

Ligang Ma, Chengming Dong, Chi Song, Xiaolan Wang, Xiaoke Zheng, Yan Niu, Shilin Chen, Weisheng Feng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. De novo genome assembly of the medicinal plant Gentiana macrophylla provides insights into the genomic evolution and biosynthesis of iridoids.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2022
    Article
  14. IsolatingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. The Effects of NAA on the Tuberous Root Yield and Quality ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ligang MaCollege of Pharmacy, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450046, China.
Chengming DongCollege of Pharmacy, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450046, China.
Chi SongKey Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Xiaolan WangCollege of Pharmacy, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450046, China.
Xiaoke ZhengCollege of Pharmacy, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450046, China.
Yan NiuWuhan Benagen Tech Solutions Company Limited, Wuhan 430070, China.
Shilin ChenKey Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Weisheng FengCollege of Pharmacy, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450046, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Genome evolutionGenome sequenceMedicinal plantOxford Nanopore TechnologyRehmannia glutinosa

Identifiers

PMID34377362
PMCPMC8318827
OpenAlexW3180116740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.