ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2021
Beyond samples: A metric revealing more connections of gut microbiota between individuals.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring methods to summarize gut microbiota composition for microbiability estimation and phenotypic prediction in swine.Journal of animal science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies of gut microbiota explore their complicated connections between individuals of different characteristics by applying different metrics to abundance data obtained from fecal samples. Although classic metrics are capable to quantify differences between samples, the microbiome of fecal sample is not a good surrogate for the gut microbiome of individuals because the microbial populations of the distal colon does not adequately represent that of the entire gastrointestinal tract. To overcome the deficiency of classic metrics in which the differences can be measured between the samples analyzed, but not the corresponding populations, we propose a metric for representing composition differences in the gut microbiota of individuals. Our investigation shows this metric outperforms traditional measures for multiple scenarios. For gut microbiota in diverse geographic populations, this metric presents more explainable data variance than others, not only in regular variance analysis but also in principle component analysis and partition analysis of biologic characteristics. With time-series data, the metric further presents a strong correlation with the time interval of serial sampling. Our findings suggest that the metric is robust and powerfully detects the intrinsic variations in gut microbiota. The metric holds promise for revealing more relations between gut microbiota and human health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.