ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Effect of minocycline hydrochloride combined with photodynamic therapy on skin barrier function of patients with acne.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy of red and blue light-emitting diode phototherapy combined with oral minocycline for acne conglobata: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Breaking boundaries: the advancements in transdermal delivery of antibiotics.Drug delivery · 2024Review
- Non-linear association between air pollutants and secondary sensitive skin in acne patients.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of minocycline hydrochloride combined with photodynamic therapy on skin barrier function of patients with acne.
methodsEighty-eight acne patients admitted to our hospital were randomized into research group (n=44, photodynamic therapy on the basis of minocycline hydrochloride) and control group (n=44, minocycline hydrochloride). The clinical efficacy, skin barrier function indexes (transdermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum water content, pH value), scores of GAGS and Acne-QOL, cosmetic satisfaction and adverse reaction rates of the two groups were compared.
resultsThe total effective rate of research group was higher than that of control group (P<0.05). After treatment, TEWL, cuticle water content and pH value were improved compared with those before treatment, and the research group was superior to the control group (all P<0.05). After treatment, the GAGS scores of both groups were lower than those before treatment, and the research group was lower than that of the control group (all P<0.05). The cosmetic satisfaction in the research group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no marked difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, the quality of life scores of patients were higher than before treatment, and the research group was higher than that of the control group (all P<0.05).
conclusionMinocycline hydrochloride combined with photodynamic therapy can effectively improve the skin barrier function of patients, relieve clinical symptoms, and enhance the overall efficacy and quality of life. It is also safe and patients are highly satisfied with the cosmetic effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34377339PMC8340184W3187936770What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.