ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Application of sputum suction by fiberoptic bronchoscope in patients with severe pneumonia and its effect on inflammatory factors.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of bronchoscopy-assisted postoperative respiratory management in patients with lung cancer and impaired cough strength: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Effect of bronchoalveolar lavage combined with high-dose ambroxol hydrochloride on severe pneumonia with respiratory failure.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Prophylactic fiberoptic bronchoscopy after sleeve lobectomy can reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia: a propensity score matching study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Brochoscopic Airway Clearance Therapy vs. Conventional Sputum Aspiration: The Future of Flexible Brochoscopes in Intensive Care Units?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Application of Precise Positioning for Sputum Expectoration in ICU Patients with Pulmonary Infection.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Early pulmonary rehabilitation of COVID-19 patients in an isolation ward and intensive care unit.Tzu chi medical journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the application of sputum suction by fiberoptic bronchoscope to patients with severe pneumonia and its effect on inflammatory factors.
methodsOne hundred and three patients with severe pneumonia were randomly divided into the control group (n=52) and the observation group (n=51). Both groups were given anti-infection, antitussive and expectoration treatment. The observation group was treated with sputum suction by fiberoptic bronchoscope. The control group was treated with a vibration sputum extractor. The clinical efficacy, clinically related indexes, inflammatory factors, blood gas indexes and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score of the two groups were compared.
resultsAfter the treatment, the total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group; the length of stay in ICU, mechanical ventilation time and duration of antibiotics of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group (all P<0.05). After the treatment, the serum levels of CRP, TNF-α and PCT and APACHE II scores in the two groups were all decreased, while PaO
conclusionSputum suction and lavage by fiberoptic bronchoscope can significantly control the body's inflammatory reaction state in patients with severe pneumonia, improve their blood oxygen and promote the treatment effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34377336PMC8340194W3190572119What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.