ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
The application of whole-course nursing in patients undergoing emergency PCI and its impact on cardiac function.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of checklist-based nursing care process in patients undergoing intervention for coronary chronic total occlusions: a quasi-randomized study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Trial
- Non-pharmacological nursing interventions in patients with myocardial infarction: a systematic review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of whole course fine nursing combined with insulin pump blood glucose management on patients with diabetes mellitus combined with ischemic cerebral infarction.Nutrition & diabetes · 2025Article
- Article
- Effect of a fast-track nursing pathway for emergency percutaneous coronary intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo implement whole-course care in patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention and investigate its impact on cardiac function.
methodsThis study included 88 acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. These patients were randomly divided into the control group (n=44, which underwent routine care) and the experimental group (n=44, which underwent whole-course care). The cardiac function, physiological states, quality of life, complications, and the patient satisfaction with the care were compared between the two groups.
resultsCompared with before the surgery, the left ventricular ejection fractions and the cardiac output in both groups at discharge were increased, while the left ventricular end-systolic diameters and left ventricular end-diastolic diameters were decreased (all P<0.05). In addition, the changes in the experimental group were greater than they were in the control group (all P<0.05). The HAMA and HAMD scores in the two groups at discharge were decreased compared with before the surgeries, but the GQOLI-74 scores in all aspects were increased (all P<0.05). Similarly, the changes in the experimental group were greater than those in the control group (all P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the experimental group was lower than it was in the control group, and the satisfaction with care was higher than it was in the control group (both P<0.05).
conclusionsThe whole-course care of AMI patients undergoing PCI can significantly relieve their negative emotions, improve their cardiac function, increase their quality of life, and reduce their incidences of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34377323PMC8340182W3191347762What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.