ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Comparison of clinical effects of general anesthesia and intraspinal anesthesia on total hip arthroplasty.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of ultrasound-guided Iliopsoas Plane Block on postoperative immune function and recovery quality in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Anesthetic Effect of the Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block with Different Approaches on Total Hip Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Inflammation.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Spiral Computed Tomography Imaging Analysis of Positioning of Lumbar Spinal Nerve Anesthesia under the Concept of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Clinical Study on the Application of Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Combined with Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Block in Inguinal Surgery in the Elderly.Journal of medical ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the clinical effects of general anesthesia and intraspinal anesthesia on total hip arthroplasty.
methodsA total of 110 patients who underwent unilateral total hip arthroplasty in our hospital were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, with 55 patients in each group. The observation group was given intraspinal anesthesia, while the control group was given general anesthesia. The excellent anesthesia rate, intraoperative blood pressure, intraoperative heart rate, observation time in the postoperative recovery room, the incidence of complications and hospitalization time were observed and compared between the two groups.
resultsCompared with the control group, the excellent anesthesia rate of the observation group increased (P<0.05). The observation time in the postoperative recovery room, intraoperative blood pressure, intraoperative heart rate and incidence of complications in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). The hospitalization time of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05).
conclusionIntraspinal anesthesia in total hip arthroplasty can significantly improve the excellent anesthesia rate, help maintain the intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate and reduce the observation time in the postoperative recovery room, incidence of complications and hospitalization time of patients, which can be recommended in clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34377312PMC8340245What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.