ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
The safety of iodixanol in interventional therapy for patients of different ages with cerebrovascular diseases.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to explore the therapeutic effect and safety of iodixanol in interventional therapy for patients of different ages with cerebrovascular diseases.
methodsA total of 132 patients undergoing interventional therapy for cerebrovascular diseases in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into the young adult group (≤44 years old, 44 cases), the middle-aged adult group (45-59 years old, 48 cases), and the older adult group (≥60 years old, 40 cases). All patients were treated with iodixsanol as the contrast agent for cerebrovascular interventional therapy. The patients' renal function (serum creatinine (SCr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels) before and after treatment and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared among the three groups.
resultsAt 48 h before operation, 2 h after operation and 48 h after operation, the levels of SCr and BUN in the older adult group were higher than those in the young adult group (all P<0.001), whereas the levels of SCr and BUN were similar between the older adult group and the middle-aged adult group and between the middle-aged adult group and the young adult group (all P>0.05). Within each group, the levels of SCR and BUN at 48 h before operation did not differ from those at 2 h and 48 h after operation (all P>0.05). No intergroup differences were found in the incidences of adverse reactions after using iodixanol for cerebrovascular interventional therapy (all P>0.05).
conclusionIodixanol as a contrast medium shows good safety in interventional therapy for patients of different ages with cerebrovascular diseases; additionally, it has no significant impact on the renal function of patients and it leads to a low incidence of adverse reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34377310PMC8340189W3187444326What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.