ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Application of painless nursing in cesarean delivery parturients due to the failure of natural childbirth via labor analgesia.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the application of painless nursing in cesarean delivery parturients due to the failure of natural childbirth via labor analgesia.
methodsA total of 124 parturients who were transferred to cesarean delivery due to the failure of natural childbirth via labor analgesia were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The control group received routine nursing, while the research group was given painless nursing in the operating room, which mainly included interventions in terms of the environment, labor process, and delivery procedure. The visual analog scale (VAS), gestation outcome, stress response, anxiety, sleep quality, and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.
resultsCompared with the control group, the sleep quality score was significantly lower in the research group (all P<0.001). Compared with before nursing, the anxiety and VAS scores of the two groups were significantly decreased after nursing (P<0.001). Additionally, the anxiety and VAS scores of the research group after nursing were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference for the gestation outcome between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with before nursing, the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) after nursing were significantly downregulated, while the level of superoxide dismutase (SOD) was significantly upregulated in both groups (all P<0.001). Compared with the control group, the levels of MDA and ROS were significantly lower, while SOD level was significantly higher in the research group after nursing (all P<0.001). Compared with the control group, the nursing satisfaction was significantly higher in the research group (P<0.05).
conclusionThe painless nursing for cesarean delivery parturients in the operating room due to the failure of natural childbirth via labor analgesia can effectively improve the sleep quality and negative moods of the parturients, reduce the degree of pain and stress response in the process of delivery, and result in better satisfaction and compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34377297PMC8340151W3202217130What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.