ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Microsurgical clipping vs. arterial embolization in the treatment of ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endovascular coiling vs. microsurgical clipping for ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms: an updated meta-analysis with meta-regression.Neuroradiology · 2026Pooled it
- Neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling for patients with ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of Coil Embolization in Small, Anterior Circulation Aneurysms in Patients Less Than 40 Years Old.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Value of sildenafil treatment for the prevention of vasospasm‑related delayed ischemic neurological deficits and delayed brain infarction following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Medicine internationalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to compare the efficacy of microsurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms with that of arterial embolization in the treatment of ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms.
methodsThe clinical data of 68 patients treated in our hospital for ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms between January 2017 and March 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the surgical methods, the patients were divided into two groups: the microsurgical clipping group (30 cases) and the arterial embolization group (38 cases). The following markers were compared between the two groups: Hunt-Hess classification (HHC) grading, aneurysm occlusion rate, and incidence of postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, hospitalization cost, and the scores of the Glasgow Outcome Scale, Modified Rankin Scale, and Barthel Index during the 6-months follow-up after hospital discharge.
resultsThe cases of HHC grade I and II increased in both groups at hospital discharge (both P<0.05), and there was no intergroup difference in this marker (P>0.05). The complete occlusion rate in the microsurgical clipping group was higher than that in the arterial embolization group (P<0.05). Compared with the microsurgical clipping group, the arterial embolization group had shorter length of hospital stay and higher hospitalization cost (both P<0.05). There was no difference in the total incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the arterial embolization group had lower incidence of intracranial infection and higher incidence of vasospasm than the microsurgical clipping group (both P<0.05). During the follow-up, the arterial embolization group had better results in terms of the Modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index results and had more patients with GOS score of 5 points than the microsurgical clipping group (all P<0.05).
conclusionBoth microsurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms and arterial embolization can effectively treat ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms, and the short-term efficacy achieved by these two methods is similar. Compared with microsurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms, arterial embolization can lead to shorter hospitalization, lower incidence of intracranial infection, and better patients' prognosis and quality of life after the operation. However, the microsurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms can achieve higher complete occlusion rate, lower incidence of vasospasm, and lower hospitalization cost than arterial embolization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34377286PMC8340242W3188191051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.