ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Analysis of the application of "psycho-cardiology" model in nursing care of acute stroke patients with depression.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacological, non-invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for treating depression after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- The Efficacy of Double-Heart Nursing in Combination with Seaweed Polysaccharide for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Complicated with Diabetes: A Pilot, Randomized Clinical Trial.Disease markers · 2022Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effect of "psycho-cardiology" model in nursing care of acute stroke patients with depression.
methodsSeventy-eight acute stroke patients with depression were selected for this prospective study, and they were divided into two groups according to the random number table method. The control group (n=39) were given usual care, and the study group (n=39) were given nursing intervention of "psycho-cardiology" model in addition to usual care. The changes of mental state (Hamilton Depression Scale, HAMD; Hamilton Anxiety Scale, HAMA), the neurological function (National Institute of Health Stroke scale, NIHSS), and the cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE), the prognostic indicator (Fugl-Meyer Assessment, FMA; Barthel Index, BI) were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. The incidence of complications and nursing satisfaction were also compared between the two groups.
resultsAfter nursing, the scores of HAMA and HAMD in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The NIHSS score of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The score of MMSE in the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The scores of FMA and BI in the study group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05).
conclusionNursing intervention of "psycho-cardiology" model for acute stroke patients with depression can effectively alleviate the mental stress of patients, improve neurological function and cognitive function, reduce the occurrence of complications, improve prognosis and nursing satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34377284PMC8340265W3192580925What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.