The role of the humanoid diagram teaching strategy in the nursing of women undergoing caesarean section.

Yajing Zhang, Rongli Lan, Ping Li, Ting Gong, Min Wang

Open access · greenAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yajing ZhangNursing Department, Yichun People's Hospital Yichun 336000, Jiangxi, China.

Rongli LanNursing Department, Yichun People's Hospital Yichun 336000, Jiangxi, China.

Ping LiInternet Hospital Management Office, Yichun People's Hospital Yichun 336000, Jiangxi, China.

Ting GongDepartment of Urology, Yichun People's Hospital Yichun 336000, Jiangxi, China.

Min WangNursing Department, Yichun People's Hospital Yichun 336000, Jiangxi, China.

Yichun University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the application of the humanoid diagram teaching strategy (HDTS) to the care of women undergoing caesarean section.

methods80 women undergoing caesarean section were recruited as the study cohort, with 37 patients who underwent caesarean section before the implementation of HDTS placed in the control group (CNG), and the other 43 cases, who underwent caesarean section after the implementation of HDTS, were placed in the study group (SG). We compared the two groups' incidences of postpartum complications, their pain levels, their negative moods, and their nursing satisfaction levels.

resultsThe total postoperative complication rates (uterine adhesions, infections, bleeding, etc.) were 2.33% in the SG and 16.22% in the CNG (P<0.05), and the pain levels were significantly lower in the SG than they were in the CNG (P<0.05). The self-assessment scale (SAS) and self-assessment scale (SDS) scores were lower in the SG than they were in the CNG (P<0.05). Meanwhile, 97.67% of the patients in the SG and 83.78% of the patients in the CNG were satisfied with the nursing care (P<0.05).

conclusionHDTS helps to reduce the complication rate following caesarean section, improves the postoperative pain levels and adverse moods, and improves the patients' satisfaction levels with the nursing interventions, so it is of positive significance for the doctor-patient relationship and worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Indexed as

applicationcaesarean sectionHumanoid diagram teaching strategynursing

Identifiers

PMID34377279

PMCPMC8340180

OpenAlexW3187260093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.