ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Effectiveness of central venous pressure versus stroke volume variation in guiding fluid management in renal transplantation.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Perioperative Management on Short-Term Renal Transplant Outcome: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Pediatric transplantation · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of the CVP Score: A Cross-Sectional Study in Greece.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Pulse pressure variation versus central venous pressure guided fluid management therapy in kidney transplant recipients: A single-blinded prospective randomized control study.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of central venous pressure (CVP) versus stroke volume variation (SVV) to guide fluid management in renal transplantation.
methodsThe clinical data of 97 patients who underwent allogeneic renal transplantation in our hospital were collected retrospectively. Based on the method of intraoperative infusion monitoring, they were divided into group A, which received guided fluid management by monitoring CVP, and group B which received guided fluid management by monitoring SVV. The changes in intraoperative hemodynamic indicators, urine volume, blood loss, and total blood transfusion volume, total fluid volume, urine output at different time points after surgery, renal function indicators, blood purification rate, length of stay, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.
resultsCVP values at T1 (5 min before surgery), T2 (external iliac vein obstruction), T3 (establishment of vessel access), and T4 (end of surgery) in group B were higher than those in group A (
conclusionCompared with CVP, fluid management guided by monitoring SVV during renal transplantation can reduce intraoperative fluid volume, optimize the renal perfusion, reduce postoperative blood purification, and facilitate postoperative recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34377262PMC8340163What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.