ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Ultrasound vs. histologic findings in 40 patients with special types of ectopic pregnancy.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of emergency point-of-care ultrasound on time to diagnosis and treatment amongst patients with ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of the study was to analyze the ultrasound findings and imaging features of patients with special types of ectopic pregnancy.
methodsThe ultrasound findings of 40 patients with special types of ectopic pregnancy in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed.
resultsAmong 40 patients, there were 17 cases of corneal pregnancy, 12 cases of cervical pregnancy, 8 cases of uterine scar pregnancy, and 3 cases of incomplete abortion confirmed by operation and pathology. The accuracy rate of ultrasound findings in the diagnosis of 40 special types of ectopic pregnancy was 77.50%, with a consistency rate of 70.59% for cornual pregnancy, 83.33% for cervical pregnancy, 100.00% for cesarean scar pregnancy and 33.33% for incomplete abortion. There were 9 misdiagnoses in ultrasound diagnosis, including 5 misdiagnoses of angular pregnancy (misdiagnosed as 4 cases of tubal interstitial pregnancy and 1 case of trophoblastic tumor), 2 misdiagnoses of cervical pregnancy (misdiagnosed as incomplete abortion), and 2 misdiagnoses of incomplete abortion (misdiagnosed as isthmus pregnancy). There was no misdiagnosed case of cesarean scar pregnancy.
conclusionUltrasound findings have some value in the diagnosis of specific types of ectopic pregnancy and can help identify different types of ectopic pregnancy. Transabdominal ultrasound and transvaginal ultrasound should be clinically combined to obtain more information for diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34377260PMC8340217What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.