ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Analysis of subjective and objective safety risks in nursing care of pediatric hematologic diseases.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore safety risks in the common nursing care of pediatric hematologic diseases.
methodsA total of 100 children with hematologic diseases treated in our hospital were included and randomly divided into a control group (n = 49) and an observation group (n = 51). Children in the control group received routine nursing according to previous practice, while children in the observation group received special environmental nursing with a large number of nurses who had received professional nursing education. After a period of time, the related satisfaction of the two groups of patients was investigated and compared.
resultsThere were significant differences in nursing environment, the quantity of nursing staff, and the nursing level between the control group and the observation group. The proportion of patients with treatment compliance and accident incidence in the observation group was significantly different from that in the control group, indicating some safety risks in the nursing care of pediatric hematologic diseases.
conclusionReducing the probability of various risks in the process of nursing care can create a high-quality and comfortable rehabilitation environment for patients, so as to improve the patients' satisfaction with the service of medical staffs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34377250PMC8340258What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.