ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Effect of microincisional cataract surgery on inflammatory indicators in tears and corneal endothelial cells in cataract patients.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for posterior capsule opacification following phacovitrectomy: a six-year retrospective analysis.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Recurrence of herpetic keratouveitis following cataract surgery.International ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Article
- Corneal endothelial cell loss after EX-PRESS surgery depends on site of insertion, cornea or trabecular meshwork.International ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the effect of microincisional cataract surgery on inflammation in tears and corneal endothelial cells in cataract patients.
methodsA total of 103 patients with cataracts in our hospital were enrolled and randomly divided into group A (n=52) and group B (n=51) by a random double-blind lottery. Group A received 1.8 mm coaxial microincision cataract surgery (C-MICS) while group B received 3.0 mm C-MICS, and the efficacy was compared between the two groups.
resultsAverage ultrasound energy (AVG), accumulative phaco time (APT), and effective phaco time (EPT) did not differ between groups (
conclusionCompared with other types of similar surgery, C-MICS can significantly control inflammation levels, with less effect on corneal endothelial cells, improve postoperative visual acuity, delay tear film break-up, increase tear secretion, and improve dry eye syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34377247PMC8340243W3192329032What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.