Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34377191›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2021

Guidance on technical requirements for regulated food and feed product applications to establish the presence of small particles including nanoparticles.

EFSA Scientific Committee, Simon More, Vasileios Bampidis, Diane Benford, Claude Bragard, Thorhallur Halldorsson, Antonio Hernández-Jerez, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Kostas Koutsoumanis, Claude Lambré and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 182 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
182citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

182 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Safety ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Safety of cannabidiol isolated fromEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Safety assessment of the substance 1,3-benzenedicarboxamide, 5-[[[EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

122 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

EFSA Scientific Committee
Simon More
Vasileios Bampidis
Diane Benford
Claude Bragard
Thorhallur Halldorsson
Antonio Hernández-Jerez
Susanne Hougaard Bennekou
Kostas Koutsoumanis
Claude Lambré
Kyriaki Machera
Hanspeter Naegeli
Søren Nielsen
Josef Schlatter
Dieter Schrenk
Vittorio Silano Deceased
Dominique Turck
Maged Younes
Jacqueline Castenmiller
Qasim Chaudhry
Francesco Cubadda
Roland Franz
David Gott
Jan Mast
Alicja Mortensen
Agnes G Oomen
Stefan Weigel
Eric Barthelemy
Ana Rincon
Jose Tarazona
Reinhilde Schoonjans

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following a mandate from the European Commission, EFSA has developed a Guidance on Technical Requirements (Guidance on Particle-TR), defining the criteria for assessing the presence of a fraction of small particles, and setting out information requirements for applications in the regulated food and feed product areas (e.g. novel food, food/feed additives, food contact materials and pesticides). These requirements apply to particles requiring specific assessment at the nanoscale in conventional materials that do not meet the definition of engineered nanomaterial as set out in the Novel Food Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. The guidance outlines appraisal criteria grouped in three sections, to confirm whether or not the conventional risk assessment should be complemented with nanospecific considerations. The first group addresses solubility and dissolution rate as key physicochemical properties to assess whether consumers will be exposed to particles. The second group establishes the information requirements for assessing whether the conventional material contains a fraction or consists of small particles, and its characterisation. The third group describes the information to be presented for existing safety studies to demonstrate that the fraction of small particles, including particles at the nanoscale, has been properly evaluated. In addition, in order to guide the appraisal of existing safety studies, recommendations for closing the data gaps while minimising the need for conducting new animal studies are provided. This Guidance on Particle-TR complements the Guidance on risk assessment of nanomaterials to be applied in the food and feed chain, human and animal health updated by the EFSA Scientific Committee as co-published with this Guidance. Applicants are advised to consult both guidance documents before conducting new studies.

Indexed as

dissolution/degradation rateelectron microscopynanofractionnanomaterialparticle size distributionsample dispersion protocolsolubility

Identifiers

PMID34377191
PMCPMC8331058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.