ReviewClinical and experimental gastroenterology2021
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: An Update on Best Practice.
Review in Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dye-free versus dye-containing submucosal injection solutions in ESD for colorectal LST: a multi-center retrospective study on efficacy and safety.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection: Challenges, innovations, and the road ahead.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Review
- Large colorectal lesions: Expanding the boundaries of endoscopic management.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Short-term outcomes of endoscopic intermuscular dissection for early rectal cancer with deep submucosal infiltration: a single-center experience from China.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastrointestinal malignancies: Current state and future perspectives.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Outcomes of Colonic Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Advanced Tissue Resection in Obese Patients: An Analysis of a Large Western Cohort.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A comprehensive review of innovations in cancer diagnosis and management.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Different endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques: a tailored approach.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025Review
- The Old: Is There Any Role for Screening Colonoscopy after the Age of 75? The Surgeon's Perspective.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025Review
- Risk Factors for Perforation in Endoscopic Treatment for Early Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide ENTER-K Study.Gut and liver · 2025Article
- Establishing a nomogram for predicting the risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024Review
- Endoscopic techniques for management of large colorectal polyps, strictures and leaks.Surgery open science · 2024Article
- The Outcomes of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Honam Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (HASID) Multicenter Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Robotic Platforms for Therapeutic Flexible Endoscopy: A Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Thermal Ablation after Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Safety and efficacy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.Endoscopy international open · 2023Review
- Image-enhanced endoscopy and endoscopic resection practices in the colon among endoscopists in India.Endoscopy international open · 2022Article
- Editorial commentary on the Indian Journal of Gastroenterology-March-April 2022.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a method of en-bloc resection of neoplastic colorectal lesions which is less invasive compared to surgical resection. Lesion stratification, architecture recognition and estimation of depth of invasion are crucial for patient selection. Expert endoscopists have integrated a variety of classification systems including Paris, lateral spreading tumor (LST), narrow band imaging (NBI), international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) and Japanese NBI expert team (JNET) in their day-to-day practice to enhance lesion detection accuracy. Major societies recommend ESD for LST-non granular (NG), Kudo-VI type, large depressed and protruded colonic lesions with shallow submucosal invasion. Chance of submucosal invasion enhances with increased depth as well as tumor location and size. In comparison to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), ESD has a lowerl recurrence rate and higher curative resection rate, making it superior for larger colonic lesions management. Major complications such as bleeding and perforation could be seen in up to 11% and 16% of patients, respectively. In major Western countries, performing ESD is challenging due to limited number of expert providers, lack of insurance coverage, and unique patient characteristics such as higher BMI and higher percentage of previously manipulated lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.