Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34376890›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychological medicine2021

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Feasibility and Acceptability of Telephone-Based Psychosocial Interventions in Individuals who Attempted Suicide.

Priya Sreedaran, Ram Pratap Beniwal, Uttara Chari, Smitha T S, Vidhya Shree S V, Varsha Gupta, Triptish Bhatia, Smita N Deshpande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Priya SreedaranDept. of Psychiatry, St John's Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Ram Pratap BeniwalDept. of Psychiatry, Centre of Excellence in Mental Health, ABVIMS & Dr RML Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Uttara ChariDept. of Clinical Psychology, St John's MEDICAL college, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Smitha T SDept. of Psychiatry, St John's Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Vidhya Shree S VDept. of Psychiatry, St John's Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Varsha GuptaDept. of Psychiatry, Centre of Excellence in Mental Health, ABVIMS & Dr RML Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Triptish BhatiaDept. of Psychiatry, Centre of Excellence in Mental Health, ABVIMS & Dr RML Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Smita N DeshpandeDept. of Psychiatry, Centre of Excellence in Mental Health, ABVIMS & Dr RML Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

Psychiatric research infrastructure for intervention and implementation in India – TEAMSD43TW009114 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Smita N Deshpande, Mary Elizabeth Hawk · 2014 to 2026
$3.2M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrief contact interventions such as telephone-based contacts appear to be useful in individuals who attempted suicide. Most studies of telephone-based contacts in such individuals typically consisted of frequent phone reminders for adherence to treatment and seeking help for mental health issues. Telephone-based psychosocial interventions that incorporate elements of supportive and problem-solving strategies are of interest in Indian settings due to their potential application in mitigating the wide mental health gap. Feasibility studies of telephone-based psychosocial interventions could help ascertain the difficulties that arise in the implementation of such treatments.

methodsA multicentric randomized controlled trial (RCT) is currently underway in general hospital settings in two Indian cities to study the efficacy of telephone-based psychosocial interventions in individuals with a recent suicide attempt, with routine telephone contacts (TCs) serving as the comparator. Prior to that RCT, this feasibility study was conducted to assess the acceptability of the telephone-based intervention and telephone contacts. Feasibility was assessed using dropout rates. Acceptability was assessed using participant-rated Likert-based visual analog scores from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.

resultsDropout rates and mean acceptability scores for telephone-based psychosocial interventions were 38.5% and 8.63, while those for TCs were 41.7% and 7.57, respectively.

conclusionsTelephone-based psychosocial interventions are feasible and acceptable in individuals with a recent suicide attempt.

Indexed as

brief contactpsychosocialsuicideSuicide attempttelephone interventions

Identifiers

PMID34376890
PMCPMC8313454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.