Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34376886›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychological medicine2021

Use of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Adolescents: A Retrospective Study.

Sandeep Grover, Venkatesh Raju, Subho Chakrabarti, Akhilesh Sharma, Ruchita Shah, Ajit Avasthi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandeep GroverDept. of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Venkatesh RajuDept. of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Subho ChakrabartiDept. of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Akhilesh SharmaDept. of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ruchita ShahDept. of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ajit AvasthiDept. of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical profile of adolescents aged up to 19 years who had received electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

methodsA retrospective chart review was carried out to identify adolescents aged up to 19 years who had received ECT during the period 2012-2018. Details regarding their sociodemographic and clinical variables and ECT data were extracted from the records.

resultsDuring the study period, a total of 51 adolescents received ECT, and complete records of 50 patients were available for analysis. 4.04% (51 out of 1260) of the patients who received ECT were aged up to 19 years. There was a decreasing trend of use of ECT over the years. The most common diagnosis was schizophrenia (42%), and this was followed by bipolar disorder (22%) and unipolar depression (20%). The mean number of ECTs administered per patient was 8.84 (SD: 5.34; range: 1-21). On the various rating scales, the percentage improvement in patients with psychotic disorders was 77.4%. For patients with depression, the percentage improvement was 77.2%, and that for mania was 80.3%. The percentage improvement in organic catatonia was 64.6%. The number of patients achieving ≥50% response ranged from 87.5% to 100%, and when the response was defined as ≥75% improvement, the proportion of patients varied from 50% to 76.9%. The majority of patients with depression (72.7%) and mania (77.8%) achieved remission. Immediate complications associated with the use of ECT included acute blood pressure changes (18%). CONCLUSION ECT IS EFFECTIVE AND SAFE IN ADOLESCENTS WITH SEVERE MENTAL DISORDERS THE CLINICIAN SHOULD NOT HESITATE AND DELAY THE USE OF ECT IN ADOLESCENTS WHO REQUIRE IT:

Indexed as

adolescentsEffectivenessElectroconvulsive therapy

Identifiers

PMID34376886
PMCPMC8313452
OpenAlexW3096982261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.