Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34376809›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord2022

Implementation of the spinal cord injury exercise guidelines in the hospital and community settings: Protocol for a type II hybrid trial.

Jasmin K Ma, Kristen Walden, Christopher B McBride, Catherine Le Cornu Levett, Regina Colistro, Tova Plashkes, Teri Thorson, Hattie Shu, Kathleen A Martin Ginis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04493606 (Implementation of the ProACTIVE Toolkit in the Hospital and Community Setting to Improve Physical Activity Among People With Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04493606 naunknown statusnot on this map

Implementation of the ProACTIVE Toolkit in the Hospital and Community Setting to Improve Physical Activity Among People With Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled38ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmsSCI ProACTIVE Coaching (objective 1), Implementation Intervention (objective 2)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jasmin K MaUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Jasmin.ma@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0193-4820
Kristen WaldenPraxis Spinal Cord Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Christopher B McBrideSpinal Cord Injury BC, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Catherine Le Cornu LevettGF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Regina ColistroGF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Tova PlashkesGF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Teri ThorsonSpinal Cord Injury BC, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6809-976X
Hattie ShuUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9984-7794
Kathleen A Martin GinisDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7076-3594
GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre · CASpinal Cord Injury BC · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAPraxis Spinal Cord Institute · CAUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CA

Funding

Arthritis Society (Société de l'arthrite) TPF-18-0209Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR) 17936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designType II hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial protocol.

objectivesTo (1) evaluate the implementation of coordinated physical activity (PA) coaching delivered by physiotherapists and spinal cord injury (SCI) peers during the transition from in-hospital care to living in a community (implementation objective) and (2) assess the effect of coaching on PA behaviour and psychosocial predictors among people with SCI (effectiveness objective).

settingRehabilitation hospital and home/community settings in British Columbia, Canada.

methodsImplementation objective: PA coaches (physiotherapists and SCI peers) receive an implementation intervention including training, monitoring, feedback, and champion support. A Theoretical Domains Framework-based questionnaire is collected at baseline, post-training, 2, and 6 months follow-up and semi-structured interviews conducted at 6 months. Effectiveness objective: Using a quasi-experimental design, 55 adults with SCI are allocated to intervention (PA coaching, n = 30) or control (usual care, n = 25) groups. Participants in the intervention group are referred by physiotherapists to receive 11 SCI peer-delivered PA coaching sessions in the community. Control participants received usual care. Questionnaires assessing PA behaviour and psychosocial predictors are administered at baseline, 2-months, 6-months, and 1-year. Semi-structured interviews are conducted to assess intervention satisfaction at 6 months. Analyses include one-way (implementation objective) and two-way (effectiveness objective) repeated measures ANCOVAs for questionnaire-reported outcomes and thematic content analysis for interview data. Data are summarised using the reach effectiveness adoption implementation maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board approved the protocol (#H19-02694), clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT04493606. Documentation of the adoption process will inform implementation in future sites.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesAdultExerciseHospitalsHumansMotor ActivitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34376809
PMCPMC8353218
OpenAlexW3187844979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.