Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34376738›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Exploring the selectivity of guanine scaffold in anticancer drug development by computational repurposing approach.

D R Sherin, T K Manojkumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D R SherinSchool of Digital Sciences, Kerala University of Digital Sciences, Innovation and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India. sherin.dr@iiitmk.ac.in.
T K ManojkumarSchool of Digital Sciences, Kerala University of Digital Sciences, Innovation and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India. manojtk@iiitmk.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug repurposing is one of the modern techniques used in the drug discovery to find out the new targets for existing drugs. Insilico methods have a major role in this approach. We used 60 FDA approved antiviral drugs reported in the last 50 years to screen against different cancer cell receptors. The thirteen compounds selected after virtual screening are analyzed for their druggability based on ADMET parameters and found the selectivity of guanine derivatives-didanosine, entecavir, acyclovir, valganciclovir, penciclovir, ganciclovir and valacyclovir as suitable candidates. The pharmacophore model, AARR, suggested based on the common feature alignment, shows that the two fused rings as in guanine and two acceptors-one from keto-oxygen (A5) and other from the substituent attached to nitrogen of imidazole ring (A4) give the druggability to the guanine derivatives. The NBO analysis on N9 is indicative of charge distribution from the ring to substituents, which results in delocalization of negative character in most of the ligands. The molecular dynamics simulations also pointed out the importance of guanine scaffold, which stabilizes the ligands inside the binding pocket of the receptor. All these results are indicative of the selectivity of guanine scaffold in anticancer drug development, especially as PARP1 inhibitors in breast, ovarian and prostate cancer. As these seven molecules are already approved by FDA, we can safely go for further preclinical trials.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentAntineoplastic AgentsComputational BiologyDrug DiscoveryDrug RepositioningGuanineHumansMolecular StructureNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsGuanine

Identifiers

PMID34376738
PMCPMC8355261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.