Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34376714›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

3D brain tumor segmentation using a two-stage optimal mass transport algorithm.

Wen-Wei Lin, Cheng Juang, Mei-Heng Yueh, Tsung-Ming Huang, Tiexiang Li, Sheng Wang, Shing-Tung Yau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. OMT and tensor SVD-based deep learning model for segmentation and predicting genetic markers of glioma: A multicenter study.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Wen-Wei Lin *Department of Applied Mathematics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Cheng Juang *Electronics Department, Ming Hsin University of Science and Technology, Hsinchu, 304, Taiwan.
Mei-Heng Yueh *Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, 116, Taiwan.
Tsung-Ming HuangDepartment of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, 116, Taiwan. min@ntnu.edu.tw.
Tiexiang LiSchool of Mathematics, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, People's Republic of China.
Sheng WangDepartment of Applied Mathematics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Shing-Tung YauDepartment of Mathematics, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
National Taiwan Normal University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWHarvard University · USMinghsin University of Science and Technology · TWSoutheast University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal mass transport (OMT) theory, the goal of which is to move any irregular 3D object (i.e., the brain) without causing significant distortion, is used to preprocess brain tumor datasets for the first time in this paper. The first stage of a two-stage OMT (TSOMT) procedure transforms the brain into a unit solid ball. The second stage transforms the unit ball into a cube, as it is easier to apply a 3D convolutional neural network to rectangular coordinates. Small variations in the local mass-measure stretch ratio among all the brain tumor datasets confirm the robustness of the transform. Additionally, the distortion is kept at a minimum with a reasonable transport cost. The original [Formula: see text] dataset is thus reduced to a cube of [Formula: see text], which is a 76.6% reduction in the total number of voxels, without losing much detail. Three typical U-Nets are trained separately to predict the whole tumor (WT), tumor core (TC), and enhanced tumor (ET) from the cube. An impressive training accuracy of 0.9822 in the WT cube is achieved at 400 epochs. An inverse TSOMT method is applied to the predicted cube to obtain the brain results. The conversion loss from the TSOMT method to the inverse TSOMT method is found to be less than one percent. For training, good Dice scores (0.9781 for the WT, 0.9637 for the TC, and 0.9305 for the ET) can be obtained. Significant improvements in brain tumor detection and the segmentation accuracy are achieved. For testing, postprocessing (rotation) is added to the TSOMT, U-Net prediction, and inverse TSOMT methods for an accuracy improvement of one to two percent. It takes 200 seconds to complete the whole segmentation process on each new brain tumor dataset.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImaging, Three-DimensionalBrain MappingBrain NeoplasmsDatasets as TopicHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID34376714
PMCPMC8355223
OpenAlexW3187922971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.