Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34376556›Full record

SynthesisRMD open2021

Use and detailed metric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review covering two decades.

Ayşe A Küçükdeveci, Atilla H Elhan, Beyza D Erdoğan, Şehim Kutlay, Derya Gökmen, Can Ateş, Selcen Yüksel, Asa Lundgren-Nilsson, Reuben Escorpizo, Gerold Stucki and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in RMD open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Latest findings from the RABBIT register].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2022
    Review
  15. Future challenges in rheumatology - is telemedicine the solution?Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Ayşe A KüçükdeveciDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Atilla H ElhanDepartment of Biostatistics, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Beyza D ErdoğanDepartment of Biostatistics, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Şehim KutlayDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Derya GökmenDepartment of Biostatistics, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Can AteşDepartment of Biostatistics, Aksaray University, School of Medicine, Aksaray, Turkey.
Selcen YükselDepartment of Biostatistics, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Asa Lundgren-NilssonInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.
Reuben EscorpizoDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Gerold StuckiDepartment of Health Sciences and Health Policy, University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland.
Alan TennantLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK.
Philip G ConaghanLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK p.conaghan@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3478-5665
Ankara University · TRUniversity of Leeds · GBAksaray University · TRAnkara Yıldırım Beyazıt University · TRUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Lucerne · CHUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe importance of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical studies has been recognised for many years. The current study aims to describe the RA PROMs used over the past 20 years, and their performance metrics, to underpin appropriate tool selection.

methodsThe study included a systematic search for PROMs that have been in use over the period 2000-2019, with detailed documentation of their psychometric properties, and a user-friendly presentation of the extensive evidence base.

results125 PROMs were identified with psychometric evidence available. The domains of pain, fatigue, emotional functions, mobility, physical functioning and work dominated, with self-efficacy and coping as personal factors. Domains such as stiffness and sleep were poorly served. The most frequently used PROMs included the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ), the Short Form 36 (SF-36), the EuroQoL and the Modified HAQ which, between them, appeared in more than 3500 papers. Strong psychometric evidence was found for the HAQ, and the SF-36 Physical Functioning and Vitality (fatigue) domains. Otherwise, all domains except stiffness, sleep, education and health utility, had at least one PROM with moderate level of psychometric evidence.

conclusionThere is a broad range of PROMs for measuring RA outcomes, but the quality of psychometric evidence varies widely. This work identifies gaps in key RA domains according to the biopsychosocial model.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePainPsychometricsarthritispatient reported outcome measuresqualitative researchrheumatoid

Identifiers

PMID34376556
PMCPMC8356163
OpenAlexW3192587200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.