Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34376508›Full record

ArticleNeurology2021

Association of Age With Contrast-Enhancing Lesions Across the Multiple Sclerosis Disease Spectrum.

Marcus W Koch, Jop Mostert, Yinan Zhang, Jerry S Wolinsky, Fred D Lublin, Eva Strijbis, Gary Cutter

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00211887 phase3completednot on this map

A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Study Comparing the Combined Use of Interferon Beta-1a and Glatiramer Acetate to Either Agent Alone in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (CombiRx)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFred LublinRan2005 to 2013Enrolled1,008ConditionsRelapsing Remitting Multiple SclerosisArmsInterferon beta 1-a, glatiramer acetate, placebo
NCT00731692 phase3terminatednot on this map

A Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of 0.5mg Fingolimod Administered Orally Once Daily Versus Placebo in Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis and An Open-label, Single-arm Extension Study to the Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of0.5 mg FTY720 Administered Orally Once Daily Versus Placebo in Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2008 to 2015Enrolled970ConditionsPrimary Progressive Multiple SclerosisArmsFTY720, Placebo
NCT01416181 phase3terminatednot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy of Natalizumab on Reducing Disability Progression in Subjects With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis, With Optional Open-Label Extension

TypeinterventionalSponsorBiogenRan2011 to 2016Enrolled889ConditionsSecondary Progressive Multiple SclerosisArmsnatalizumab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Brain atrophy rates vary with age in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Correlates and trajectories of relapses in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Marcus W KochFrom the Departments of Clinical Neurosciences (M.W.K.) and Community Health Sciences (M.W.K.), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurology (J.M.), Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (Y.Z., F.D.L.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth); Department of Neurology (E.S.), MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Department of Biostatistics (G.C.), University of Alabama at Birmingham. mwkoch@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9972-5092
Jop MostertFrom the Departments of Clinical Neurosciences (M.W.K.) and Community Health Sciences (M.W.K.), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurology (J.M.), Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (Y.Z., F.D.L.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth); Department of Neurology (E.S.), MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Department of Biostatistics (G.C.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Yinan ZhangFrom the Departments of Clinical Neurosciences (M.W.K.) and Community Health Sciences (M.W.K.), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurology (J.M.), Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (Y.Z., F.D.L.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth); Department of Neurology (E.S.), MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Department of Biostatistics (G.C.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Jerry S WolinskyFrom the Departments of Clinical Neurosciences (M.W.K.) and Community Health Sciences (M.W.K.), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurology (J.M.), Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (Y.Z., F.D.L.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth); Department of Neurology (E.S.), MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Department of Biostatistics (G.C.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.ORCID 0000-0002-8197-2762
Fred D LublinFrom the Departments of Clinical Neurosciences (M.W.K.) and Community Health Sciences (M.W.K.), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurology (J.M.), Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (Y.Z., F.D.L.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth); Department of Neurology (E.S.), MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Department of Biostatistics (G.C.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Eva StrijbisFrom the Departments of Clinical Neurosciences (M.W.K.) and Community Health Sciences (M.W.K.), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurology (J.M.), Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (Y.Z., F.D.L.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth); Department of Neurology (E.S.), MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Department of Biostatistics (G.C.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Gary CutterFrom the Departments of Clinical Neurosciences (M.W.K.) and Community Health Sciences (M.W.K.), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurology (J.M.), Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (Y.Z., F.D.L.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth); Department of Neurology (E.S.), MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Department of Biostatistics (G.C.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

Extension of Combination Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis (eCombiRx)U01NS045719 · NINDS · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI LUBLIN, FRED D · 2003 to 2012
$44.7M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS045719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesTo investigate the association of age and the presence of contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs) on cranial MRI scans in different disease courses of multiple sclerosis (MS), we describe the frequency of CELs as a function of age in 4 large randomized controlled trial (RCT) datasets.

methodsUsing original trial data from CombiRx (Combination Therapy in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis; clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00211887), a trial in relapsing-remitting MS; ASCEND (A Clinical Study of the Efficacy of Natalizumab on Reducing Disability Progression in Participants With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis; clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01416181), a trial in secondary progressive MS; and the 2 primary progressive MS trials PROMISE and INFORMS; clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00731692), we describe the occurrence of CELs per age group at baseline for the entire trial cohort and at 1 year follow-up in the treatment arms.

resultsCombiRx included 1,008, ASCEND 889, PROMISE 943, and INFORMS 970 participants. At baseline, CEL frequency differed between datasets according to disease course: 39.6% of CombiRx, 23.9% of ASCEND, 14.0% of PROMISE, and 12.3% of INFORMS participants had CELs. This distribution by disease course was largely preserved within each age group. In all datasets, there was an almost linear decrease of the percentage of participants with CELs with advancing age. After 1 year of experimental treatment, CEL occurrence was reduced in all trial datasets, and almost absent in ASCEND. The decrease of CEL occurrence with advancing age was preserved in CombiRx, PROMISE, and INFORMS after 1 year of treatment. We investigated the association of the baseline factors age, disease duration, sex, and EDSS with having CELs at baseline with multivariable binary logistic regression models. Age was the only characteristic associated with the risk of CELs at baseline in all datasets, with higher age associated with a lower risk of CELs (odds ratios for having CELs at baseline per year increase in age: CombiRx: 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-0.98; ASCEND: 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.97; PROMISE: 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.96; INFORMS: 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99). DISCUSSION: Our analysis of 4 large, well-characterized RCT datasets shows that the association of age and CEL occurrence is a general phenomenon across the spectrum of MS disease courses. Our findings should be replicated in real-world MS datasets.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID34376508
PMCPMC8589289
OpenAlexW3187939800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.