Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34376494›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2021

Risks of Intradiscal Orthobiologic Injections: A Review of the Literature and Case Series Presentation.

Mairin A Jerome, Christopher Lutz, Gregory E Lutz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07386548 (Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Injection With MRI's - A Prospective Randomized Control Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07386548 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Injection With MRI's - A Prospective Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2026 to 2030Enrolled90ConditionsDegenerative Disc Disease, DDD, Degenerative Disc Disease Lumbar, Degenerative Disc Disease, LumbarArmsBone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Biologic Therapies for Discogenic Pain.Current pain and headache reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mairin A JeromeRegenerative SportsCare Institute, New York, New York.
Christopher LutzRegenerative SportsCare Institute, New York, New York.
Gregory E LutzRegenerative SportsCare Institute, New York, New York.
Cornell University · USHospital for Special Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntervertebral disc disease (IDD) is responsible for a large portion of back pain with historically suboptimal treatments for long-term improvement. IDD pathogenesis is thought to arise at a cellular and biochemical level, making biologically based injections an area of clinical interest. Although human studies have shown promise, emerging data suggest there may be risks inherent to such injections that were previously unrecognized. The aim of this review is to summarize the known risks to date and provide mitigation steps to reduce potential complications in the future. In addition, we present a small case series of serious adverse events (SAEs) from our clinical practice.

methodsA literature review was performed to identify human intradiscal autologous biologic injection studies to date, including mesenchymal signaling cells (MSCs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparations, which were reviewed for complications. Cases of complication following intradiscal orthobiologic injection were identified from a single outpatient center and reviewed.

resultsPublications of MSC-based intradiscal injection documented 136 total patients treated with two SAEs reported, one infection and one progressive disc herniation. Publications of PRP intradiscal injection included 194 patients with one SAE reported. We also review three cases of previously unpublished SAEs, including one case of confirmed infection with

conclusionsAlthough biologic intradiscal injection shows promise for the treatment of discogenic back pain, there are inherent risks to be considered and mitigated. We currently recommend a leukocyte-rich PRP and a two-needle delivery technique coupled with intradiscal gentamicin to mitigate the risk of postinjection spondylodiscitis. Further research is needed using large registries to not only track clinical outcomes but also complication rates.

Indexed as

bone marrow concentratecomplicationsintradiscal biologicspercutaneous injectionplatelet-rich plasma

Identifiers

PMID34376494
PMCPMC8092939
OpenAlexW3154483577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.