Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34376388›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2021

Navigating the shifting sands of filtering facepiece respirator provision during the COVID-19 pandemic: a system response for maximising staff safety.

Carrick Allison, Mike Tennant, Peter Xiang, Jennifer Stephens, Oliver Ball, Niall Wilton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carrick AllisonAnaesthetic Department, Starship Children's Health, Auckland, New Zealand.
Mike TennantAnaesthetic Department, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Peter XiangAnaesthetic Department, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jennifer StephensAnaesthetic Department, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Oliver BallAnaesthetic Department, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Niall WiltonAnaesthetic Department, Starship Children's Health, Auckland, New Zealand niallw@adhb.govt.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-2939-8513
Auckland City Hospital · NZStarship Children's Health · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPersonal protective equipment is essential to protect health workers and patients and to ensure confidence when dealing with aerosolised disease transmission. We describe the process for ensuring adequate filtering facepiece respirator (FFR) qualitative fit testing at a local level during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsCascaded training is described, which allowed rapid spreading of the testing process, with supervision allowing quality assurance throughout. Testing consisted of subjective 'fit checking', checking for leaks, followed by qualitative hood testing.

resultsThe original respirators (3M 1870) had a hood test pass rate of 87.5%. Following identification of this as a non-renewable and unsustainable option, a domestically manufactured and sustainable Help-It P2 duckbill-type respirator was adopted as the primary FFR. The hood test pass rate for this respirator was only 54%. A third respirator was made available (3M 1860), with a high pass rate of 80% but also a limited and non-renewable resource. Algorithms were constructed highlighting different proportional use of the respirators depending on the most limited resource.

conclusionThe testing format used is simple, reproducible and can be used by any hospital organisation when occupational health and safety departments are unable to provide the service during overwhelming demand. Qualitative fit testing is a scalable and effective method for ensuring appropriately sized and shaped FFRs, minimising resource consumption in the process. The use of a product with appropriate filtration capacity but a lower fit test pass rate (domestic duckbill respirator) as a replaceable resource facilitated adequate respirator availability for staff that would otherwise not have been possible. The provision of an FFR fit registry allows an organisation to make appropriate respirators available to staff from different sources as supply and demand changes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Protective DevicesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Ventilators, MechanicalCOVID-19equipment and suppliesequipment safetyhealthcare quality improvement

Identifiers

PMID34376388
PMCPMC8359858
OpenAlexW3189630704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.