Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34376299›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2021

Dynamic Filtering of Adherent and Non-adherent Microbubble Signals Using Singular Value Thresholding and Normalized Singular Spectrum Area Techniques.

Elizabeth B Herbst, Alexander L Klibanov, John A Hossack, F William Mauldin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbubble Contrast Agents for Molecular Ultrasound Imaging of Tumor Vasculature.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth B HerbstDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Alexander L KlibanovDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
John A HossackDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
F William MauldinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. Electronic address: hossack@virginia.edu.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Ultrasound Targeted Molecular Imaging in Large Arteries to Predict AAA RiskR01HL132395 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HOSSACK, JOHN A · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
Ultrasound Targeted Molecular Imaging in Large Arteries to Diagnose Stroke RiskR01HL111077 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HOSSACK, JOHN A · 2012 to 2015
$1.4M
VisualSonics Vevo 2100 Small Animal Ultrasound Imaging System and AccessoriesS10RR027333 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HOSSACK, JOHN A · 2010 to 2010
$482k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027333NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL111077NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL132395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound molecular imaging techniques rely on the separation and identification of three types of signals: static tissue, adherent microbubbles and non-adherent microbubbles. In this study, the image filtering techniques of singular value thresholding (SVT) and normalized singular spectrum area (NSSA) were combined to isolate and identify vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-targeted microbubbles in a mouse hindlimb tumor model (n = 24). By use of a Verasonics Vantage 256 imaging system with an L12-5 transducer, a custom-programmed pulse inversion sequence employing synthetic aperture virtual source element imaging was used to collect contrast images of mouse tumors perfused with microbubbles. SVT was used to suppress static tissue signals by 9.6 dB while retaining adherent and non-adherent microbubble signals. NSSA was used to classify microbubble signals as adherent or non-adherent with high accuracy (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [ROC AUC] = 0.97), matching the classification performance of differential targeted enhancement. The combined SVT + NSSA filtering method also outperformed differential targeted enhancement in differentiating MB signals from all other signals (ROC AUC = 0.89) without necessitating destruction of the contrast agent. The results from this study indicate that SVT and NSSA can be used to automatically segment and classify contrast signals. This filtering method with potential real-time capability could be used in future diagnostic settings to improve workflow and speed the clinical uptake of ultrasound molecular imaging techniques.

Indexed as

MicrobubblesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAnimalsContrast MediaMiceMolecular ImagingUltrasonographyContrast MediaVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AMicrobubblesNormalized singular spectrum areaSingular value thresholdingUltrasound molecular imaging

Identifiers

PMID34376299
PMCPMC8691388
OpenAlexW3189774678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.