Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34376268›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS2022

Test-Retest Reliability of a Semi-Structured Interview to Aid in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Diagnosis.

Danielle C Hergert, Veronik Sicard, David D Stephenson, Sharvani Pabbathi Reddy, Cidney R Robertson-Benta, Andrew B Dodd, Edward J Bedrick, Gerard A Gioia, Timothy B Meier, Nicholas A Shaff and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cognition and post-concussive symptom status after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Danielle C HergertThe Mind Research Network/Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0860-2674
Veronik SicardThe Mind Research Network/Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2452-934X
David D StephensonThe Mind Research Network/Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Sharvani Pabbathi ReddyThe Mind Research Network/Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Cidney R Robertson-BentaThe Mind Research Network/Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Andrew B DoddThe Mind Research Network/Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Edward J BedrickDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Gerard A GioiaDepartment of Pediatrics and Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Timothy B MeierDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Nicholas A ShaffThe Mind Research Network/Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Davin K QuinnDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Richard A CampbellDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
John P PhillipsThe Mind Research Network/Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Andrei A VakhtinThe Mind Research Network/Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Robert E SapienDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Andrew R MayerThe Mind Research Network/Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

Funding

University of New Mexico (UNM) Center for Brain Recovery and RepairP20GM109089 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI SHUTTLEWORTH, CLAUDE W · 2015 to 2024
$22.7M
The Impact of Diffuse Mild Brain Injury on Clinical Outcomes in ChildrenR01NS098494 · NINDS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI Andrew Robert Mayer · 2016 to 2026
$7.6M
Pilot Project Program (PPP)P30GM122734 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI MAYER, ANDREW ROBERT · 2018 to 2022
$7.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109089NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM122734NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS098494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRetrospective self-report is typically used for diagnosing previous pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI). A new semi-structured interview instrument (New Mexico Assessment of Pediatric TBI; NewMAP TBI) investigated test-retest reliability for TBI characteristics in both the TBI that qualified for study inclusion and for lifetime history of TBI.

methodOne-hundred and eight-four mTBI (aged 8-18), 156 matched healthy controls (HC), and their parents completed the NewMAP TBI within 11 days (subacute; SA) and 4 months (early chronic; EC) of injury, with a subset returning at 1 year (late chronic; LC).

resultsThe test-retest reliability of common TBI characteristics [loss of consciousness (LOC), post-traumatic amnesia (PTA), retrograde amnesia, confusion/disorientation] and post-concussion symptoms (PCS) were examined across study visits. Aside from PTA, binary reporting (present/absent) for all TBI characteristics exhibited acceptable (≥0.60) test-retest reliability for both Qualifying and Remote TBIs across all three visits. In contrast, reliability for continuous data (exact duration) was generally unacceptable, with LOC and PCS meeting acceptable criteria at only half of the assessments. Transforming continuous self-report ratings into discrete categories based on injury severity resulted in acceptable reliability. Reliability was not strongly affected by the parent completing the NewMAP TBI.

conclusionsCategorical reporting of TBI characteristics in children and adolescents can aid clinicians in retrospectively obtaining reliable estimates of TBI severity up to a year post-injury. However, test-retest reliability is strongly impacted by the initial data distribution, selected statistical methods, and potentially by patient difficulty in distinguishing among conceptually similar medical concepts (i.e., PTA

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticPost-Concussion SyndromeAdolescentAmnesia, RetrogradeChildConfusionHumansReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesAdolescentBrain concussionPediatricsSelf-reportsTest–retest reliabilityTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID34376268
PMCPMC8831656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.