Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34376254›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2021

Implementation strategy fidelity evaluation for a multidisciplinary Chest Injury Protocol (ChIP).

Sarah Kourouche, Kate Curtis, Belinda Munroe, Michael Watts, Sharyn Balzer, Thomas Buckley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah KouroucheFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Nursing School, The University of Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, 88 Mallet St, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. Sarah.Kourouche@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6210-6191
Kate CurtisFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Nursing School, The University of Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, 88 Mallet St, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Belinda MunroeFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Nursing School, The University of Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, 88 Mallet St, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Michael WattsIntensive Care, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Crown St, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Sharyn BalzerEmergency Services, Shoalhaven Memorial District Hospital, Shoalhaven, NSW, Australia.
Thomas BuckleyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Nursing School, The University of Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, 88 Mallet St, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUShoalhaven District Memorial Hospital · AUWollongong Hospital · AU

Funding

HCF Research Foundation xx
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlunt chest wall injuries can lead to complications, especially without early intervention. A blunt Chest Injury Protocol (ChIP) was developed to help improve the consistency of evidence-based care following admission to the emergency department. Implementation strategy fidelity is the extent to which the strategies of implementation are delivered in line with the intended plan. The aim of this study was to assess fidelity to the strategies of the implementation plan developed for ChIP.

methodsA retrospective evaluation of strategies used for implementation was performed, specifically the behaviour change techniques (BCTs). BCTs were used as part of an implementation plan derived based on the Behaviour Change Wheel from results from a staff survey at two hospitals. Levels of implementation or adaptation for BCTs were scored by implementers as follows: 'Were the behaviour change interventions implemented?' (0 = 'not implemented', 1 = partially implemented, and 2 = fully implemented); 'Were adaptations made to the implementation plan?', scored 1 (many changes from plan) to 4 (just as planned). Free text explanation to their responses was also collected with supporting evidence and documentation (such as emails, implementation checklists, audit reports, and incident reports).

resultsThere was high overall fidelity of 97.6% for BCTs partially or fully implemented. More than three quarters (32/42, 76.2%) of the BCTs were fully implemented with an additional 9/42 (21.4%) partially implemented. BCTs that were not fully implemented were social support, feedback on behaviour, feedback on outcomes of behaviour, adding objects to the environment, and restructuring the environment. The modes of delivery with poorer implementation or increased adaptations were clinical champions and audit/feedback.

conclusionsThis study describes the evaluation of implementation strategy fidelity in the acute care context. The systematic use and application of the behaviour change wheel was used to develop an implementation plan and was associated with high implementation strategy fidelity. A fidelity checklist developed during the implementation process may help implementers assess fidelity.

trial registrationTrial registered on ANZCTR. Registration number ACTRN12618001548224 , date approved 17/09/2018.

Indexed as

Behaviour changeBlunt chest wall injuryCare bundleEmergencyImplementation strategyInjuryIntervention fidelitynursingProcess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID34376254
PMCPMC8353870
OpenAlexW3187393117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.