Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34376219›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

An assessment of the knowledge, practices and resources during the delivery of malaria health care services among private health care practitioners: a cross section study in the Mid-Western Region of Uganda.

Humphrey Wanzira, Daniel Tumwine, Patrick Bukoma, Alan Musiime, Juliet Biculu, Tom Ediamu, Samuel Gudoi, James K Tibenderana, Ronald Mulebeke, Rebecca Nantanda and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Humphrey Wanzira *Uganda Paediatric Association, Kampala, Uganda. wanzirah@yahoo.com.
Daniel Tumwine *Uganda Paediatric Association, Kampala, Uganda.
Patrick Bukoma *Malaria Action Program for Districts, Malaria Consortium, Kampala, Uganda.
Alan Musiime *Uganda Paediatric Association, Kampala, Uganda.
Juliet Biculu *Uganda Paediatric Association, Kampala, Uganda.
Tom Ediamu *Uganda Paediatric Association, Kampala, Uganda.
Samuel Gudoi *Malaria Action Program for Districts, Malaria Consortium, Kampala, Uganda.
James K Tibenderana *Malaria Action Program for Districts, Malaria Consortium, Kampala, Uganda.
Ronald Mulebeke *Uganda Paediatric Association, Kampala, Uganda.
Rebecca Nantanda *Uganda Paediatric Association, Kampala, Uganda.
Jane Achan *Uganda Paediatric Association, Kampala, Uganda.
African Palliative Care Association · UGMalaria Consortium · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 50 % of the population in Uganda seeks health care from private facilities but there is limited data on the quality of care for malaria in these facilities. This study aimed to document the knowledge, practices and resources during the delivery of malaria care services, among private health practitioners in the Mid-Western region of Uganda, an area of moderate malaria transmission.

methodsThis was a cross sectional study in which purposive sampling was used to select fifteen private-for-profit facilities from each district. An interviewer-administered questionnaire that contained both quantitative and open-ended questions was used. Information was collected on availability of treatment aides, knowledge on malaria, malaria case management, laboratory practices, malaria drugs stock and data management. We determined the proportion of health workers that adequately provided malaria case management according to national standards.

resultsOf the 135 health facilities staff interviewed, 61.48 % (52.91-69.40) had access to malaria treatment protocols while 48.89 % (40.19-57.63) received malaria training. The majority of facilities, 98.52 % (94.75-99.82) had malaria diagnostic services and the most commonly available anti-malarial drug was artemether-lumefantrine, 85.19 % (78-91), followed by Quinine, 74.81 % (67-82) and intravenous artesunate, 72.59 % (64-80). Only 14.07 % (8.69-21.10) responded adequately to the acceptable cascade of malaria case management practice. Specifically, 33.33 % (25.46-41.96) responded correctly to management of a patient with a fever, 40.00 % (31.67-48.79) responded correctly to the first line treatment for uncomplicated malaria, whereas 85.19 % (78.05-90.71) responded correctly to severe malaria treatment. Only 28.83 % submitted monthly reports, where malaria data was recorded, to the national database.

conclusionsThis study revealed sub-optimal malaria case management knowledge and practices at private health facilities with approximately 14 % of health care workers demonstrating correct malaria case management cascade practices. To strengthen the quality of malaria case management, it is recommended that the NMCD distributes current guidelines and tools, coupled with training; continuous mentorship and supportive supervision; provision of adequate stock of essential anti-malarials and RDTs; reinforcing communication and behavior change; and increasing support for data management at private health facilities.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsMalariaArtemetherArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareHealth FacilitiesHumansPrivate SectorUgandaAntimalarialsArtemetherArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationMalariaPrivate health care workers

Identifiers

PMID34376219
PMCPMC8356442
OpenAlexW3187146197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.