ArticleBMC plant biology2021
Genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9 in Pinus radiata (D. Don).
Article in BMC plant biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR RNP-Mediated Transgene-Free Genome Editing in Plants: Advances, Challenges and Future Directions for Tree Species.Plant, cell & environment · 2026Review
- Development ofFrontiers in genome editing · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic and enzymological evidence for plastid peptidoglycan synthesis in the gymnosperm Picea abies.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- NGATHA carpel development genes evolved in the common ancestor of seed plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Controlling CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in human cells using a molecular glue degrader.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- A Protoplast System for CRISPR-Cas Ribonucleoprotein Delivery inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Highly Efficient Homozygous CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing Based on Single-Cell-Originated Somatic Embryogenesis inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Identification of U6 Promoter and Establishment of Gene-Editing System inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Improvement of genome editing efficiency by Cas9 codon optimization in Japanese cedar (Plant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- Efficient gene editing of a model fern species through gametophyte-based transformation.Plant physiology · 2024Article
- A transcriptome atlas of zygotic and somatic embryogenesis in Norway spruce.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2024Article
- Applications of CRISPR Technologies in Forestry and Molecular Wood Biotechnology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Small molecules, enormous functions: potential approach for overcoming bottlenecks in embryogenic tissue induction and maintenance in conifers.Horticulture research · 2024Review
- Deep learning for automated segmentation and counting of hypocotyl and cotyledon regions in matureFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Advances inFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Genetic transformation in conifers: current status and future prospects.Forestry research · 2024Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein mediated DNA-free genome editing in larch.Forestry research · 2024Article
- BreedingFrontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-mediated disruption of CjACOS5 confers no-pollen formation on sugi trees (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don).Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The economics and policy of genome editing in crop improvement.The plant genome · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo meet increasing demand for forest-based products and protect natural forests from further deforestation requires increased productivity from planted forests. Genetic improvement of conifers by traditional breeding is time consuming due to the long juvenile phase and genome complexity. Genetic modification (GM) offers the opportunity to make transformational changes in shorter time frames but is challenged by current genetically modified organism (GMO) regulations. Genome editing, which can be used to generate site-specific mutations, offers the opportunity to rapidly implement targeted improvements and is globally regulated in a less restrictive way than GM technologies.
resultsWe have demonstrated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in P. radiata targeting a single-copy cell wall gene GUX1 in somatic embryogenic tissue and produced plantlets from the edited tissue. We generated biallelic INDELs with an efficiency of 15 % using a single gRNA. 12 % of the transgenic embryogenic tissue was edited when two gRNAs were used and deletions of up to 1.3 kb were identified. However, the regenerated plants did not contain large deletions but had single nucleotide insertions at one of the target sites. We assessed the use of CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) for their ability to accomplish DNA-free genome editing in P. radiata. We chose a hybrid approach, with RNPs co-delivered with a plasmid-based selectable marker. A two-gRNA strategy was used which produced an editing efficiency of 33 %, and generated INDELs, including large deletions. Using the RNP approach, deletions found in embryogenic tissue were also present in the plantlets. But, all plants produced using the RNP strategy were monoallelic.
conclusionsWe have demonstrated the generation of biallelic and monoallelic INDELs in the coniferous tree P. radiata with the CRISPR/Cas9 system using plasmid expressed Cas9 gRNA and RNPs respectively. This opens the opportunity to apply genome editing in conifers to rapidly modify key traits of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.