Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34376060›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2021

Suprasternal Versus Transfemoral Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From a Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Michael I Brener, Anna Olds, Samantha Nemeth, Paul Kurlansky, Tamim M Nazif, Torsten P Vahl, Omar K Khalique, Nadira B Hamid, Amisha Patel, Vivian G Ng and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Michael I BrenerDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Anna OldsDepartment of Surgery University of Southern California Los Angeles CA.
Samantha NemethDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery Department of Surgery College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Paul KurlanskyDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery Department of Surgery College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Tamim M NazifDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Torsten P VahlDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Omar K KhaliqueDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Nadira B HamidDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Amisha PatelDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Vivian G NgDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Shmuel ChenDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Thomas J CahillDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Hussein M RahimDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Rebecca T HahnDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Vinayak BapatDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery Department of Surgery Minneapolis Heart Institute Minneapolis MN.
Mohammad SarrafPrinceton Heart and Thoracic Brookwood Baptist Health Birmingham AL.
Mustafa I AhmedDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Alabama-Birmingham AL.
Martin B LeonDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Susheel KodaliDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Kyle W EudaileyDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Alabama-Birmingham AL.
Isaac GeorgeDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery Department of Surgery College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USBrookwood Baptist Health · USMinneapolis Heart Institute Foundation · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN ARTERIOSCLEROSIS RESEARCHT32HL007343 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HENRY N GINSBERG, Muredach P Reilly · 1985 to 2026
$12.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Suprasternal access is an alternative access strategy for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) where the innominate artery is cannulated from an incision above the sternal notch. To date, suprasternal access has never been compared with transfemoral TAVR. Thus, we sought to assess safety, feasibility, and early clinical outcomes between suprasternal and transfemoral access for patients undergoing TAVR. Methods and Results We evaluated patients from 2 institutional prospective, observational registries containing 1348 patients. Patients were selected in a 2:1 ratio (transfemoral:suprasternal) on the basis of propensity score matching. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included the incidence of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, vascular injury, left bundle-branch block, and permanent pacemaker implantation at 30-day follow-up. Propensity score matching identified 89 patients undergoing suprasternal TAVR and 159 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR suitable for analysis. There was no significant difference between suprasternal TAVR and transfemoral TAVR with respect to in-hospital mortality (1.1% versus 0.6%; odds ratio [OR], 1.80; 95% CI, 0.11-29.06;

Indexed as

Brachiocephalic TrunkCatheterization, PeripheralFemoral ArteryTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAged, 80 and overAlabamaAortic Valve StenosisFeasibility StudiesFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleNew York CityPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity Scoreaccess siteaortic stenosissuprasternaltranscatheter aortic valve implantationtransfemoral aortic valve implantation

Identifiers

PMID34376060
PMCPMC8475036
OpenAlexW3192721205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.