ArticleBiomedical physics & engineering express2021
Fabrication of microcalcifications for insertion into phantoms used to evaluate x-ray breast imaging systems.
Article in Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated assessment of task-based performance of digital mammography and tomosynthesis systems using an anthropomorphic breast phantom and deep learning-based scoring.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Report on the AAPM deep-learning spectral CT Grand Challenge.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Microcalcification detectability in breast CT images using CNN observers.Medical physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physical breast phantoms can be used to evaluate x-ray imaging systems such as mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and dedicated breast computed tomography (bCT). These phantoms typically attempt to mimic x-ray attenuation properties of adipose and fibroglandular tissues within the breast. In order to use these phantoms for task-based objective assessment of image quality, relevant diagnostic features should be modeled within the phantom, such as mass lesions and/or microcalcifications. Evaluating imaging system performance in detecting microcalcifications is of particular interest due to its' clinical significance. Many previously-developed phantoms have used materials that model microcalcifications using unrealistic chemical composition, which do not accurately portray their desired x-ray attenuation and scatter properties. We report here on a new method for developing real microcalcification simulants that can be embedded in breast phantoms. This was achieved in several steps, including cross-linking hydroxyapatite and calcium oxalate powders with a binder called polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and mechanical compression. The fabricated microcalcifications were evaluated by measuring their x-ray attenuation and scatter properties using x-ray spectroscopy and x-ray diffraction systems, respectively, and were demonstrated with x-ray mammography and bCT images. Results suggest that using these microcalcification models will make breast phantoms more realistic for use in evaluating task-based detection performance of the abovementioned breast imaging techniques, and bode well for extending their use to spectral imaging and x-ray coherent scatter computed tomography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.