Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34375554›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2021

The three Ts of virulence evolution during zoonotic emergence.

Elisa Visher, Claire Evensen, Sarah Guth, Edith Lai, Marina Norfolk, Carly Rozins, Nina A Sokolov, Melissa Sui, Michael Boots

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The human monkeypox in Saudi Arabia and global tourism.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elisa VisherDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Claire EvensenMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
Sarah GuthDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Edith LaiCollege of Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Marina NorfolkCollege of Letters and Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Carly RozinsDepartment of Science and Technology Studies, Division of Natural Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3.
Nina A SokolovDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Melissa SuiCollege of Letters and Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Michael BootsDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

Funding

Ecology and evolution of multiple transmission modes: anther-smut diseaseR01GM122061 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI ANTONOVICS, JANIS · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the role that evolution may play in current and future pandemics, but there is often also considerable confusion about the actual evolutionary predictions. This may be, in part, due to a historical separation of evolutionary and medical fields, but there is a large, somewhat nuanced body of evidence-supported theory on the evolution of infectious disease. In this review, we synthesize this evolutionary theory in order to provide a framework for clearer understanding of the key principles. Specifically, we discuss the selection acting on zoonotic pathogens' transmission rates and virulence at spillover and during emergence. We explain how the direction and strength of selection during epidemics of emerging zoonotic disease can be understood by a three Ts framework: trade-offs, transmission, and time scales. Virulence and transmission rate may trade-off, but transmission rate is likely to be favoured by selection early in emergence, particularly if maladapted zoonotic pathogens have 'no-cost' transmission rate improving mutations available to them. Additionally, the optimal virulence and transmission rates can shift with the time scale of the epidemic. Predicting pathogen evolution, therefore, depends on understanding both the trade-offs of transmission-improving mutations and the time scales of selection.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesEpidemicsBiological EvolutionHumansVirulenceemerging zoonotic diseaseevolutiontrade-offstransmissionvirulence

Identifiers

PMID34375554
PMCPMC8354747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.