Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34375553›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

Plicidentine and the repeated origins of snake venom fangs.

Alessandro Palci, Aaron R H LeBlanc, Olga Panagiotopoulou, Silke G C Cleuren, Hyab Mehari Abraha, Mark N Hutchinson, Alistair R Evans, Michael W Caldwell, Michael S Y Lee

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dynamic finite element modelling of the macaque mandible during a complete mastication gape cycle.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Plicidentine and the repeated origins of snake venom fangs.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alessandro PalciCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia.
Aaron R H LeBlancDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada, T6G 2E9.
Olga PanagiotopoulouDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.
Silke G C CleurenSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia.
Hyab Mehari AbrahaDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.
Mark N HutchinsonCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia.
Alistair R EvansSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia.
Michael W CaldwellDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada, T6G 2E9.
Michael S Y LeeCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia.
Flinders University · AUMonash University · AUUniversity of Alberta · CAMuseums Victoria · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snake fangs are an iconic exemplar of a complex adaptation, but despite striking developmental and morphological similarities, they probably evolved independently in several lineages of venomous snakes. How snakes could, uniquely among vertebrates, repeatedly evolve their complex venom delivery apparatus is an intriguing question. Here we shed light on the repeated evolution of snake venom fangs using histology, high-resolution computed tomography (microCT) and biomechanical modelling. Our examination of venomous and non-venomous species reveals that most snakes have dentine infoldings at the bases of their teeth, known as plicidentine, and that in venomous species, one of these infoldings was repurposed to form a longitudinal groove for venom delivery. Like plicidentine, venom grooves originate from infoldings of the developing dental epithelium prior to the formation of the tooth hard tissues. Derivation of the venom groove from a large plicidentine fold that develops early in tooth ontogeny reveals how snake venom fangs could originate repeatedly through the co-option of a pre-existing dental feature even without close association to a venom duct. We also show that, contrary to previous assumptions, dentine infoldings do not improve compression or bending resistance of snake teeth during biting; plicidentine may instead have a role in tooth attachment.

Indexed as

Bites and StingsToothAnimalsEpitheliumSnakesSnake VenomsSnake VenomsColubroideadevelopmentfangsOphidiaSerpentesvenom groove

Identifiers

PMID34375553
PMCPMC8354744
OpenAlexW3188357962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.