Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34375489›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational health2021

Efficacy of ice slurry and carbohydrate-electrolyte solutions for firefighters.

Shota Tabuchi, Seichi Horie, Shoko Kawanami, Daisuke Inoue, Shuhei Morizane, Jinro Inoue, Chikage Nagano, Masao Sakurai, Ryo Serizawa, Koichiro Hamada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shota TabuchiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan (UOEH), Kitakyushu, Japan.
Seichi HorieDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan (UOEH), Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8347-2630
Shoko KawanamiOccupational Health Training Center, UOEH, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Daisuke InoueDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan (UOEH), Kitakyushu, Japan.
Shuhei MorizaneDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan (UOEH), Kitakyushu, Japan.
Jinro InoueDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan (UOEH), Kitakyushu, Japan.
Chikage NaganoDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan (UOEH), Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1430-6524
Masao SakuraiSaga Nutraceuticals Research Institute, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanzaki, Japan.
Ryo SerizawaSaga Nutraceuticals Research Institute, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanzaki, Japan.
Koichiro HamadaSaga Nutraceuticals Research Institute, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kanzaki, Japan.
University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan · JPOtsuka (Japan) · JP

Funding

Otsuka Pharmaceutical
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the thermoregulatory and fluid-electrolyte responses of firefighters ingesting ice slurry and carbohydrate-electrolyte solutions before and after firefighting operations.

methodsTwelve volunteer firefighters put on fireproof clothing and ingested 5 g/kg of beverage in an anteroom at 25°C and 50% relative humidity (RH; pre-ingestion), and then performed 30 minutes of exercise on a cycle ergometer (at 125 W for 10 minutes and then 75 W for 20 minutes) in a room at 35℃ and 50% RH. The participants then returned to the anteroom, removed their fireproof clothing, ingested 20 g/kg of beverage (post-ingestion), and rested for 90 minutes. Three combinations of pre-ingestion and post-ingestion beverages were provided: a 25℃ carbohydrate-electrolyte solution for both (CH condition); 25℃ water for both (W condition); and a -1.7℃ ice slurry pre-exercise and 25℃ carbohydrate-electrolyte solution post-exercise (ICE condition).

resultsThe elevation of body temperature during exercise was lower in the ICE condition than in the other conditions. The sweat volume during exercise was lower in the ICE condition than in the other conditions. The serum sodium concentration and serum osmolality were lower in the W condition than in the CH condition.

conclusionsThe ingestion of ice slurry while firefighters were wearing fireproof clothing before exercise suppressed the elevation of body temperature during exercise. Moreover, the ingestion of carbohydrate-electrolyte solution by firefighters after exercise was useful for recovery from dehydration.

Indexed as

BeveragesFirefightersAdultBody TemperatureBody Temperature RegulationCold TemperatureDietary CarbohydratesElectrolytesExerciseHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleProtective ClothingSweatingYoung AdultDietary CarbohydratesElectrolytescarbohydrate-electrolyte solutionsfirefightersheat-related illnessice slurryprecooling

Identifiers

PMID34375489
PMCPMC8354579
OpenAlexW3188534132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.