Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34375428›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2021

Different DNA repair pathways are involved in single-strand break-induced genomic changes in plants.

Felix Wolter, Patrick Schindele, Natalja Beying, Armin Scheben, Holger Puchta

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Manipulating alternative end-joining alters carbon-ion beam-induced genome mutation profiles in Arabidopsis thaliana.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Genetic dissection of Brassica napus seed vigor after aging.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Felix WolterBotanical Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4331-2915
Patrick SchindeleBotanical Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4115-6100
Natalja BeyingBotanical Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0621-1891
Armin SchebenSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2230-2013
Holger PuchtaBotanical Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1073-8546
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology · DECold Spring Harbor Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In nature, single-strand breaks (SSBs) in DNA occur more frequently (by orders of magnitude) than double-strand breaks (DSBs). SSBs induced by the CRISPR/Cas9 nickase at a distance of 50-100 bp on opposite strands are highly mutagenic, leading to insertions/deletions (InDels), with insertions mainly occurring as direct tandem duplications. As short tandem repeats are overrepresented in plant genomes, this mechanism seems to be important for genome evolution. We investigated the distance at which paired 5'-overhanging SSBs are mutagenic and which DNA repair pathways are essential for insertion formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. We were able to detect InDel formation up to a distance of 250 bp, although with much reduced efficiency. Surprisingly, the loss of the classical nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway factors KU70 or DNA ligase 4 completely abolished tandem repeat formation. The microhomology-mediated NHEJ factor POLQ was required only for patch-like insertions, which are well-known from DSB repair as templated insertions from ectopic sites. As SSBs can also be repaired using homology, we furthermore asked whether the classical homologous recombination (HR) pathway is involved in this process in plants. The fact that RAD54 is not required for homology-mediated SSB repair demonstrates that the mechanisms for DSB- and SSB-induced HR differ in plants.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Single-StrandedDNA RepairGenome, PlantArabidopsisDNA, PlantDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID34375428
PMCPMC8566284
OpenAlexW3187837803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.