Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34375339›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Visceral Leishmaniasis in pregnancy and vertical transmission: A systematic literature review on the therapeutic orphans.

Prabin Dahal, Sauman Singh-Phulgenda, Brittany J Maguire, Eli Harriss, Koert Ritmeijer, Fabiana Alves, Philippe J Guerin, Piero L Olliaro

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Leishmaniasis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mucocutaneous Leishmaniasis in a Pregnant Immigrant.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  11. Cytotoxicity of Amphotericin B and AmBisome:Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Prabin DahalInfectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO), Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2158-846X
Sauman Singh-PhulgendaInfectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO), Oxford, United Kingdom.
Brittany J MaguireInfectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO), Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6333-0109
Eli HarrissThe Knowledge Centre, Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4635-8959
Koert RitmeijerMédecins Sans Frontières, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5924-872X
Fabiana AlvesDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6213-5224
Philippe J GuerinInfectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO), Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6008-2963
Piero L OlliaroCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1426-3680
University of Oxford · GBDrugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative · CHMédecins Sans Frontières · NL

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 208378/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReports on the occurrence and outcome of Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) in pregnant women is rare in published literature. The occurrence of VL in pregnancy is not systematically captured and cases are rarely followed-up to detect consequences of infection and treatment on the pregnant women and foetus.

methodsA review of all published literature was undertaken to identify cases of VL infections among pregnant women by searching the following database: Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; World Health Organization Global Index Medicus: LILACS (Americas); IMSEAR (South-East Asia); IMEMR (Eastern Mediterranean); WPRIM (Western Pacific); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Selection criteria included any clinical reports describing the disease in pregnancy or vertical transmission of the disease in humans. Articles meeting pre-specified inclusion criteria and non-primary research articles such as textbook, chapters, letters, retrospective case description, or reports of accidental inclusion in trials were also considered.

resultsThe systematic literature search identified 272 unique articles of which 54 records were included in this review; a further 18 records were identified from additional search of the references of the included studies or from personal communication leading to a total of 72 records (71 case reports/case series; 1 retrospective cohort study; 1926-2020) describing 451 cases of VL in pregnant women. The disease was detected during pregnancy in 398 (88.2%), retrospectively confirmed after giving birth in 52 (11.5%), and the time of identification was not clear in 1 (0.2%). Of the 398 pregnant women whose infection was identified during pregnancy, 346 (86.9%) received a treatment, 3 (0.8%) were untreated, and the treatment status was not clear in the remaining 49 (12.3%). Of 346 pregnant women, Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) was administered in 202 (58.4%) and pentavalent antimony (PA) in 93 (26.9%). Outcomes were reported in 176 pregnant women treated with L-AmB with 4 (2.3%) reports of maternal deaths, 5 (2.8%) miscarriages, and 2 (1.1%) foetal death/stillbirth. For PA, outcomes were reported in 88 of whom 4 (4.5%) died, 24 (27.3%) had spontaneous abortion, 2 (2.3%) had miscarriages. A total of 26 cases of confirmed, probable or suspected cases of vertical transmission were identified with a median detection time of 6 months (range: 0-18 months).

conclusionsOutcomes of VL treatment during pregnancy is rarely reported and under-researched. The reported articles were mainly case reports and case series and the reported information was often incomplete. From the studies identified, it is difficult to derive a generalisable information on outcomes for pregnant women and babies, although reported data favours the usage of liposomal amphotericin B for the treatment of VL in pregnant women.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousAmphotericin BAntiprotozoal AgentsFemaleHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalLeishmaniasis, VisceralMaternal DeathPregnancyPregnancy Complications, ParasiticPregnancy OutcomeTreatment OutcomeAmphotericin BAntiprotozoal Agentsliposomal amphotericin B

Identifiers

PMID34375339
PMCPMC8425569
OpenAlexW3192794890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.