ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2021
Effect of computed tomography value error on dose calculation in adaptive radiotherapy with Elekta X-ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of computed tomography value error on dose calculation in adaptive radiotherapy with Elekta X-ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe evaluated the effect of changing the scan mode of the Elekta X-ray volume imaging cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) on the accuracy of dose calculation, which may be affected by computed tomography (CT) value errors in three dimensions.
methodsWe used the electron density phantom and measured the CT values in three dimensions. CT values were compared with planning computed tomography (pCT) values for various materials. The evaluated scan modes were for head and neck (S-scan), chest (M-scan), and pelvis (L-scan) with various collimators and filter systems. To evaluate the effects of the CT value error of the CBCT on dose error, Monte Carlo calculations of dosimetry were performed using pCT and CBCT images.
resultsThe L-scan had a CT value error of approximately 800 HU at the isocenter compared with the pCT. Furthermore, inhomogeneity in the longitudinal CT value profile was observed in the bone material. The dose error for ±100 HU difference in CT values for the S-scan and M-scan was within ±2%. The center of the L-scan had a CT error of approximately 800 HU and a dose error of approximately 6%. The dose error of the L-scan occurred in the beam path in the case of both single field and two parallel opposed fields, and the maximum error occurred at the center of the phantom in the case of both the 4-field box and single-arc techniques.
conclusionsWe demonstrated the three-dimensional CT value characteristics of the CBCT by evaluating the CT value error obtained under various imaging conditions. It was found that the L-scan is considerably affected by not having a unique bowtie filter, and the S-scan without the bowtie filter causes CT value errors in the longitudinal direction. Moreover, the CBCT dose errors for the 4-field box and single-arc irradiation techniques converge to the isocenter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.