Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34374967›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2021

Remdesivir in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Spontaneous Reports in VigiBase During 2020.

Elena Rocca, Oskar Gauffin, Ruth Savage, Sara Hedfors Vidlin, Birgitta Grundmark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pharmacologic Treatment and Management of Coronavirus Disease 2019.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elena RoccaUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden. elena.rocca@nmbu.no.
Oskar GauffinUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ruth SavageUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
Sara Hedfors VidlinUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
Birgitta GrundmarkUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden. birgitta.grundmark@who-umc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-2799-9374

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe safety profile of remdesivir, conditionally approved for COVID-19, was limited at its 2020 introduction. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for medicines are collected in VigiBase, the WHO Global Database of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs).

objectiveThis study aimed to provide a descriptive analysis of COVID-19 ICSR data focusing on remdesivir, including a disproportionality analysis (DA) of ADRs.

methodsA dedicated algorithm enabled retrieval of all COVID-19 treatment-specific ICSRs. A severity algorithm based on co-reported medicines and symptoms enabled selection of tocilizumab with its well established safety profile as comparator for remdesivir. Descriptive statistics were used for general ICSR demographics for all COVID-19-specific medicines, remdesivir and tocilizumab individually and furthermore to present treatment patterns of medicines co-reported with remdesivir. A COVID-19 indication-focused DA was deployed to minimize confounding from underlying polysymptomatic disease.

results14,574 COVID-19-related ICSRs were entered into VigiBase during 2020. Remdesivir was the most common medicine reported. Of 4944 remdesivir ICSRs, where tocilizumab was not co-reported, 93% described remdesivir as the sole suspect medicine. Sixty percent of ICSRs concerned males, median age was 63 years and the majority originated from the Americas (72%). In 1089 (21%) of remdesivir ICSRs, data indicated severe/critical disease. Co-reported medicines peaked during the first 3 days of remdesivir treatment. The DA for the established tocilizumab and the new remdesivir were mainly in line with the safety profiles for both medicines but suggested new safety concerns. The most reported ADRs for remdesivir represented liver dysfunction, kidney injury, death and bradycardia.

conclusionGlobal COVID-19-related ADR reporting proved useful in providing information on ADRs as well as on treatment patterns in this patient group. Indication-focused disproportionality analysis, together with the use of a comparator with a known safety profile, proved effective in identifying known safety information and suggested new safety concerns for remdesivir.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdenosine MonophosphateAdolescentAdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAgedAge FactorsAlanineAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntiviral AgentsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntiviral Agentsremdesivirtocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID34374967
PMCPMC8353611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.