ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021
Automatic breast mass detection in mammograms using density of wavelet coefficients and a patch-based CNN.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-classification of breast cancer pathology images based on a two-stage hybrid network.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Multiple-level thresholding for breast mass detection.Journal of King Saud University. Computer and information sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFor the purpose of accurate and efficient mass detection in full-field digital mammograms, we propose a method for automated mass detection that consists of two stages: suspicious region localization and false-positive (FP) reduction, by classifying these regions into mass and non-mass regions (normal tissues).
methodsIn the first stage, the density of the wavelet coefficients based on Quincunx Lifting Scheme (DWC-QLS) is used to find suspicious regions (regions of interest, ROIs) in full mammograms. In the second stage, a patch-based CNN classifier is developed as an FP reduction to classify the suspicious regions. The main aim of this stage is to reduce the false-positive suspicious regions while keeping the true-positive suspicious regions. To further improve the performance of the FP reduction, the effectiveness of different transfer learning strategies is further explored and the best fine-tuning strategy in training InceptionV3 model is determined experimentally.
resultsThe experimental results show that the proposed method can achieve an overall performance of 0.98 TPR @1.43 FPI on the INbreast database. In addition, the suggested segmentation method detects the mass location with 100% sensitivity and average of 5.4 false positives per image.
conclusionsBased on the obtained results, the introduced method was able to successfully detect and classify suspicious regions in digital mammograms and provide better TPR and FPI results in comparison with other state-of-the-art method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.