Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34374913›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing in Breast Cancer Care Delivery.

Navraj S Nagra, Elena Tsangaris, Jessica Means, Michael J Hassett, Laura S Dominici, Jennifer R Bellon, Justin Broyles, Robert S Kaplan, Thomas W Feeley, Andrea L Pusic

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Institutional Costs of Guideline-Concordant Care Non-Receipt among Women with Breast Cancer.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Navraj S NagraBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. navraj.nagra@doctors.org.uk.
Elena TsangarisBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jessica MeansBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael J HassettDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Laura S DominiciDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer R BellonDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Justin BroylesBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Robert S KaplanInstitute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA.
Thomas W FeeleyInstitute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrea L PusicBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate measurement of healthcare costs is required to assess and improve the value of oncology care.

objectivesWe aimed to determine the cost of breast cancer care provision across collaborating health care organizations.

methodsWe used time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to calculate the complete cost of breast cancer care-initial treatment planning, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgical resection and reconstruction, and ancillary services (e.g., psychosocial oncology, physical therapy)-across multiple hospital sites. Data were collected between December 2019 and February 2020. TDABC steps involved (1) developing process maps for care delivery pathways; (2) determine capacity cost rates for staff, medical equipment, and hospital space; (3) measure the time required for each process step, both manually through clinic observation and using data from the Real-Time Location System (RTLS); and (4) calculate the total cost of care delivery.

resultsSurgical care costs ranged from $1431 for a lumpectomy to $12,129 for a mastectomy with prepectoral implant reconstruction. Radiation therapy was costed at $1224 for initial simulation and patient education, and $200 for each additional treatment. Base costs for chemotherapy delivery were $382 per visit, with additional costs driven by chemotherapy agent(s) administered. Personnel expenses were the greatest contributor to the cost of surgical care, except in mastectomy with implant reconstruction, where device costs equated to up to 60% of the cost of surgery.

conclusionThe cost of complete breast cancer care depended on (1) treatment protocols; (2) patient choice of reconstruction; and (3) the need for ancillary services (e.g., physical therapy). Understanding the actual costs and cost drivers of breast cancer care delivery may better inform resource utilization to lower the cost and improve the quality of care.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalPatient Selection

Identifiers

PMID34374913
OpenAlexW3188798396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.