Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34374802›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Prospective comparison of simultaneous [

Sander Jentjens, Cindy Mai, Niloefar Ahmadi Bidakhvidi, Liesbeth De Coster, Nathalie Mertens, Michel Koole, Wouter Everaerts, Steven Joniau, Raymond Oyen, Koen Van Laere and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Frontiers in oncology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Relationship between [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Trial
  3. Diagnostic accuracy of fully hybrid [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Trial
  4. Development and validation of a preoperativeEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Fully automated volumetric assessment of tumor burden using artificial intelligence onEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Diagnostic Performance ofIranian journal of public health · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Intra-individual qualitative and quantitative comparison of [Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. [Research progress on prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography imaging of prostate cancer].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  16. Hybrid imaging with [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sander JentjensNuclear Medicine, UZ Leuven, Herestraat, 49 3000, Leuven, Belgium. sander.jentjens@uzleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3602-9078
Cindy MaiRadiology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Niloefar Ahmadi BidakhvidiNuclear Medicine, UZ Leuven, Herestraat, 49 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Liesbeth De CosterNuclear Medicine, UZ Leuven, Herestraat, 49 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Nathalie MertensDepartment of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Michel KooleDepartment of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Wouter EveraertsUrology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Steven JoniauUrology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Raymond OyenRadiology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Koen Van LaereNuclear Medicine, UZ Leuven, Herestraat, 49 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Karolien GoffinNuclear Medicine, UZ Leuven, Herestraat, 49 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPSMA-PET has become the PET technique of choice to localise the site of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). With hybrid PET/MRI, the advantages of MRI are added to molecular characteristic of PET. The aim of this study was to investigate the incremental value of PET/MR versus PET/CT in patients with biochemically recurrent PCa by head-to-head comparison.

methodsThirty-four patients with biochemically recurrent PCa were prospectively included. They underwent [

resultsPET

conclusions[ KEY POINTS: • PSMA PET/MRI detects the location of biochemical recurrence at least as accurately as PET/CT. • Substitution of PET/CT by PET/MRI adds sensitivity in PSMA lesion detection also in the setting of distant recurrence due to both the MR and TOF PET components.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsEdetic AcidGallium RadioisotopesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOligopeptidesProspective StudiesEdetic AcidGallium RadioisotopesOligopeptidesBiochemically recurrent prostate cancerHybrid imagingPET/CTPET/MRPSMA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.